<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: gilles</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'gilles'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22gilles%22&t=%22gilles%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:00:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>So-Bad-It's-Good TV: &quot;Brothers &amp; Sisters&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3370376&amp;cid=t_173879_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fso-bad-its-good-tv-brothers-sisters%2F</link>
            <description>Rachel Griffiths and Calista Flockhart in &amp;quot;Brothers &amp; Sisters&amp;quot; (photo: Wenn)
Last night&amp;#8217;s episode of ABC&amp;#8217;s drama &amp;#8220;Brothers &amp; Sisters&amp;#8221; focused way more on the Walker girls (Sarah, played by Rachel Griffiths, and older sister Kitty, channeled by Calista Flockhart) than the boys. To recap: Kitty and Sarah got into a big fight. This happened because angry protesters heckled Kitty during one of her U.S. Senate campaign speeches, thanks to the sticky immigration status of Luc (Gilles Marini), Sarah&amp;#8217;s swarthy French fling-turned-boyfriend. Oh, and because as a petit garçon, Luc lived in his uncle&amp;#8217;s brothel. Oops.

Later, Kitty and Sarah behaved like spoiled brats (as usual), refusing to apologize to one another while slinging back glasses of ...</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3370376</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:01:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3370376</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Rules - The New Economy as an Opportunity to Disrupt Old Ways</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2102460&amp;cid=t_173879_147_f&amp;fid=38117&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.engageinhealth.com%2F2009%2F01%2Fnew_rules_the_new_economy_as_a.html</link>
            <description>Here's a guest post from the brilliant Jane Sarasohn-Kahn -- health economist, industry analyst, blogger and friend.




I’m inspired today on two fronts at the moment: first, by a Twitter message from Gilles Frydman (who goes by KosherFrog on Twitter), Founder of the Association of Cancer Online Resources (ACOR), which says, “Tell me &amp; I'll forget. Show me &amp; I may remember. Involve me &amp; I'll understand.” A Chinese proverb, Gilles asks in Twitter shorthand, “could this be the motto for Participatory Medicine?”

I’m also enthused about the new book by Robert Samuelson, The Great Inflation and Its Aftermath: The Past and Future of Affluence. Samuelson, who writes about economics for Newsweek and the Washington Post, sees the new fiscal era we’ve entered is one of “affluent de...</description>
            <author>The Health Engagement Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2102460</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:56:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2102460</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1968774&amp;cid=t_173879_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F11%2F18%2Flies-damn-lies-and-statistics%2F</link>
            <description>This report should be a must read for any health reporter, as well as for any treatment provider who relies on research to help inform their treatments.
	Read Gilles Frydman&amp;#8217;s entry: Lies, Damn Lies And Statistics: Collective Statistical Illiteracy
	Read e-Patient Dave&amp;#8217;s take on reading the report, too. (Source: World of Psychology)</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1968774</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:32:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1968774</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Trusted Doesn’t Mean Accurate or Up-to-Date</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1303243&amp;cid=t_173879_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F03%2F14%2Ftrusted-doesnt-mean-accurate-or-up-to-date%2F</link>
            <description>Consumers are constantly told to look for &amp;#8220;trusted&amp;#8221; health content online (whatever that means), even though most consumers don&amp;#8217;t systematically look for any markers for an article&amp;#8217;s quality. And when they do, the markers have little relationship to actual article quality to begin with:
	
A new study published in the journal Cancer recently confirmed what Josh Seidman of the Center for Information Therapy has also written about: the display of the source and date on a page is not correlated with the presence of high-quality information. The absence of those two markers is also not correlated with low-quality information. The one marker for inaccuracy found in the Cancer study was the presence of information about complementary and alternative medicine or CAM. CAM pa...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1303243</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1303243</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

