<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: health coverage</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'health coverage'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22health+coverage%22&t=%22health+coverage%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:22:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>11 Healthcare Predictions For 2011</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4272293&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2F11-healthcare-predictions-for-2011%2F2010.12.18</link>
            <description>Here are 11 things that are absolutely going to happen* in 2011 (they&amp;#8217;re in no particular order….or are they?):
1.  There will be no big compromise between President Obama and the Republicans on healthcare reform. Why? Because the law is such a massive collection of, well, stuff, that it is pretty much impossible to find pieces of it that you could cut a deal on, even if you wanted to. And no, the federal district court decision on the individual mandate doesn’t change my mind…and in fact may breathe new life into other parts of the law). State governments, insurance companies, and private businesses have made all kinds of important and hard to reverse choices based on the law as is. There’s not much of an appetite outside of people trying to score political points for m...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4272293</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:00:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4272293</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Employee Health: The First “Benefits Package” Blog Carnival</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4253135&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Femployee-health-the-first-benefits-package-blog-carnival%2F2010.12.13</link>
            <description>Welcome to The Benefits Package &amp;#8212; the very first employee benefits blog carnival. After healthcare reform, employee benefits move to center stage as one of the most important issues facing Americans.
So what are employers, insurers, and the government really doing to rein in healthcare costs, get their employees to live healthier lives, and improve healthcare quality?
The Benefits Package is the first-ever blog carnival dedicated to these issues. With benefits executives starting to make the leap into the blogosphere, The Benefits Package will highlight the best insights and opinions on this important subject. You will discover new blogs, learn new things, and hopefully think about issues a little differently. I’ll host the first couple of Benefits Packages, and then others will ...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4253135</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:00:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4253135</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Insurance coverage during Pregnancy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3699486&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=36941&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mazecordblood.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D525</link>
            <description>Chances are most of us have sorted this out; but there are always potholes that pop up (down?) and throw us off, particularly in this economic environment.  So, here&amp;#8217;s a brief write up on health insurance companies and what they can and cannot do regarding the expected &amp;#8211; or unexpected &amp;#8211; pregnancy. (Source: Cord Blood News)</description>
            <author>Cord Blood News</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3699486</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:08:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3699486</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Employers Can Manage Healthcare Services And Expenses</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3529789&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthblawg.typepad.com%2Ffiles%2Fgeorge-pantos-hpm-institute-healthblawg-interview-with-david-harlow-042110.mp3</link>
            <description>Healthcare costs are a perennial issue for employers and employees. There are a variety of approaches out there designed to improve health status and health outcomes and reduce costs at the same time. Proponents of a variety of approaches have been featured here on HealthBlawg in the past. 
I recently had the opportunity to speak with George Pantos, of the Healthcare Performance Management Institute, a brand-new organization on the scene, founded by a group of folks who have developed tools for managing these costs. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at HealthBlawg :: David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3529789</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:00:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3529789</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bioethicists Weigh In On the Healthcare Reform Vote (updated)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3403844&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=35052&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FWomensBioethicsBlog%2F%7E3%2FZCDfBbsuRbw%2Fbioethicists-weigh-in-on-healthcare_22.html</link>
            <description>As the readers of this blog know, both myself and several of our bloggers have posted about universal health care coverage many, many times as an ethical and moral imperative. In the last year, my hopes (along with many other bioethicists, I'm sure ) of attaining universal coverage have gone up, down and sideways, like a roller-coaster ride, exhilarating and frightening, with emotions ranging from inspiration to resignation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Now that the US House of Representative has finally passed a health reform bill, I've requested several bioethicists (and friends of the WBP) to share their thoughts on the ethical implications of the passage of this bill:
Art Caplan of UPenn:&amp;nbsp; &quot;The passage of this bill, flaws and all, represents the elimination of the single greatest failure in Americ...</description>
            <author>Women's Bioethics Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3403844</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:13:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3403844</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bioethicists Weigh In On the Healthcare Reform Vote</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3395086&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=35052&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FWomensBioethicsBlog%2F%7E3%2FZCDfBbsuRbw%2Fbioethicists-weigh-in-on-healthcare_22.html</link>
            <description>As the readers of this blog know, both myself and several of our bloggers have posted about universal health care coverage many, many times as an ethical and moral imperative. In the last year, my hopes (along with many other bioethicists, I'm sure ) of attaining universal coverage have gone up, down and sideways, like a roller-coaster ride, exhilarating and frightening, with emotions ranging from inspiration to resignation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Now that the US House of Representative has finally passed a health reform bill, I've requested several bioethicists (and friends of the WBP) to share their thoughts on the ethical implications of the passage of this bill:
Art Caplan of UPenn:&amp;nbsp; &quot;The passage of this bill, flaws and all, represents the elimination of the single greatest failure in Americ...</description>
            <author>Women's Bioethics Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3395086</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:50:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3395086</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to Reform Health Care? ‘Let Them Have Choice’</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3231461&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FN3IPr6YMUV0%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonThis is big.
The federal tax code creates a large tax preference for employer-sponsored health insurance.  As a result, 61 percent of non-elderly Americans obtain health insurance through an employer.  That tax preference creates all sorts of problems.  It encourages more comprehensive health insurance and wasteful health care spending.  It deprives many workers of their health coverage at the moment they need it most: when they get sick and can no longer work.  And it denies workers the benefits of being able to choose their health plan.  Eighty percent of those who work for an employer that offers health benefits have at most two health-plan choices, which are typically both run by the same insurer.
To date, no one had really quantified the damage done by denyin...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3231461</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:14:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3231461</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mental Health Parity Loopholes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3056699&amp;cid=t_163368_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F12%2F03%2Fmental-health-parity-loopholes%2F</link>
            <description>While the national mental health parity law takes effect on January 1, 2010, it does not trump existing state laws that mandate that mental disorder diagnoses are treated and covered equally as their physical health brethren. If you are covered by health insurance, come January 1, your mental health treatment cannot be any more limited than your physical health coverage. California is one such state that has had such a mental health parity law on the books since 2000, so we have nine years of lessons from that state.
Recently, a study was released that examined how the law affected people who sought out mental health treatment. Shari Roan with the Los Angeles Times has the coverage. The study, conducted by Mathematica Policy Research and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Admin...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3056699</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:45:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3056699</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Wal-Mart Backs Employer Health Ins.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2570657&amp;cid=t_163368_111_f&amp;fid=36048&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAHeartyLife%2F%7E3%2FTyTC1T6INLM%2F</link>
            <description>Wal-Mart Stores says it supports healthcare reform that will require employers to provide health insurance to employees. Most larger firms are against this, so Wal-Mart is setting itself apart from the trend. 

Under the new healthcare legislation that is being considered, &amp;#8220;lawmakers have proposed mandating that all but small employers provide insurance for workers or help pay for&amp;#8221; the 46 million uninsured people in the U.S.
I have to wonder if other firms will follow this lead, and vocally support employer mandated healthcare like Wal-Mart?
Image: sxc.hu.



Share and Enjoy:


	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	


Post from: Blisstree
Wal-Mart Backs Employer Health Ins. (Source: A Hearty Life)</description>
            <author>A Hearty Life</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2570657</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:17:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2570657</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Ray became our third metastatic liver cancer survivor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3808810&amp;cid=t_163368_136_f&amp;fid=35300&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fmetastatic-liver-cancer%2F%7E3%2FVUdonEfalp8%2F</link>
            <description>Ray from UK hasn&amp;#8217;t an individual health coverage and therefore stopped his successful Avastin chemotherapy to stabilise his metastatic liver cancer. Read more about our other 2 metastatic liver cancer survivors Trish and Dan:
&amp;#160;

Dan Metastatic liver cancer survivor&amp;#160;
Trish Metastatic Liver Cancer Survivor

&amp;#160;
On one hand I am surprised how seemingly easy Ray talks about major medical [...] (Source: Metastatic liver cancer)</description>
            <author>Metastatic liver cancer</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3808810</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:00:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3808810</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The “third tier” in US health care?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1419322&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=35052&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FWomensBioethicsBlog%2F%7E3%2F283351130%2Fthird-tier-in-us-health-care.html</link>
            <description>It’s a sickening situation. Physicians’ incomes are under attack: think lower reimbursements, higher costs for malpractice premiums and the like, greater business costs, claims processing hassles,...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]] (Source: Women's Bioethics Blog)</description>
            <author>Women's Bioethics Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1419322</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:45:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1419322</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>We're Number Two? The State of US Healthcare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=612369&amp;cid=t_163368_87_f&amp;fid=35052&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwomensbioethics.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F05%2Fwere-number-two-state-of-us-healthcare.html</link>
            <description>According an article in Scientific American this week, Canada has good or better health care than the U.S. despite spending half what the U.S. does on health care:&quot;Whether it is American senior citizens driving into Canada in order to buy cheap prescription drugs or Canadians coming to the U.S. for surgery in order to avoid long wait times, the relative merits of these two nations' health care systems are often cast in terms of anecdotes. Both systems are beset by ballooning costs and, especially with a presidential election on the horizon, calls for reform, but a recent study could put ammunition in the hands of people who believe it is time the U.S. ceased to be the only developed nation without universal health coverage. Gordon H. Guyatt, a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at...</description>
            <author>Women's Bioethics Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=612369</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:17:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">612369</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

