<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: health privacy</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'health privacy'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22health+privacy%22&t=%22health+privacy%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:41:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>ONC opens comments on federal HIT strategic plan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4636523&amp;cid=t_208294_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthit.hhs.gov%2Fportal%2Fserver.pt%2Fdocument%2F954074%2Ffederal_hit_strategic_plan_public_comment_period</link>
            <description>The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology today opened a four-week comment period on proposed revisions to the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan (pdf). Last updated in 2008, the plan spells out ONC&amp;#8217;s strategy for meeting national health IT goals for the five-year period beginning in 2011. The HITECH Act requires this revision.
According to a blog post by national coordinator Dr. David Blumenthal:
Some components of the Plan may already be familiar, including the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs and the grant programs created by the HITECH Act, which are creating an infrastructure to support meaningful use. However, the Plan also charts new ground for the federal health IT agenda:

In Goal I, the health information exchang...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4636523</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:29:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4636523</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Competing Naïvetés: How to Produce a Privacy-Protective Society</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3933081&amp;cid=t_208294_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FXaxNwzAs0AY%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperMy Economist.com debate on whether governments should &amp;#8220;do far more to protect online privacy&amp;#8221; has now concluded. The vote on the motion went to my opponent, supporting government involvement by a margin of 52 to 48 percent.
I won a moral victory, perhaps, moving the vote from 70 percent in favor of government intervention to the very close ending tally. My commentary highlighting the substantial role of government in undermining privacy seems to have begun moving the dial in my direction.
A pleasant side-effect of the debate was to open lines of communication with a number of my privacy-advocate colleagues, many of whom do not share my libertarian outlook. One called me naïve to think consumers can successfully demand privacy given the imposing wall of corporate p...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3933081</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:53:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3933081</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Your Medical Records Aren’t Secure</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3411091&amp;cid=t_208294_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FiyMnK-YtSzM%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperI have one observation about, and one minor difference with, the very good&amp;#8212;and very concerning&amp;#8212;Wall Street Journal opinion piece by Deborah Peel of Patient Privacy Rights. The piece announces PPR&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Do Not Disclose&amp;#8221; campaign around health information, which will soon be pouring into promiscuous, government-designed &amp;#8220;electronic medical records.&amp;#8221;
In a January 2009 speech, President Barack Obama said that his administration wants every American to have an electronic health record by 2014, and last year&amp;#8217;s stimulus bill allocated over $36 billion to build electronic record systems. Meanwhile, the Senate health-care bill just approved by the House of Representatives on Sunday [now signed into law] requires certain kinds of research ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3411091</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:52:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3411091</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FTC Exploring Privacy: Rountable Series</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3067164&amp;cid=t_208294_114_f&amp;fid=34646&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ftc.gov%2Fbcp%2Fworkshops%2Fprivacyroundtables%2FpersonalDataEcosystem.pdf</link>
            <description>Over the next couple of months the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will be hosting the Exploring Privacy: A Roundtable Services.The roundtable discussions are day-long public roundtable discussions to explore the privacy challenges posed by the vast array of 21st century technology and business practices that collect and use consumer data.The FTC indicates that the &quot;roundtable discussions will cover topics including social networking, cloud computing, online behavioral advertising, mobile marketing, and the collection and use of information by retailers, data brokers, third-party applications, and other diverse businesses. The goal of the roundtables is to determine how best to protect consumer privacy while supporting beneficial uses of the information and technological innovation.&quot;More in...</description>
            <author>Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3067164</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:35:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3067164</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>I vote against John McCain because he is a risk to people with melanoma, not because of his risk of melanoma.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2522983&amp;cid=t_208294_93_f&amp;fid=35707&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fhemodynamics%2F%7E3%2FHsSC58LOiG8%2Fi-vote-against-john-mccain-because-he.html</link>
            <description>Before I go any farther, let me just say that this post is the one time I'll say anything sympathetic about John McCain who I desperately hope loses this election and loses big. But this isn't about him, really.It seems like during most election seasons, the New York Times' Lawrence Altman MD seems to get worked up about whether he has had enough access to political candidates' health records. Altman was a medical resident about 40 years ago and has never been much of a clinician as far as I can tell besides that--he did preventive health, public health work, and journalism. But, he seems to feel that reporters--and especially, he, being a doctor/reporter--have a right to go over presidential candidates' health records.This is an appalling idea if we take away John McCain and our hope to s...</description>
            <author>hemodynamics</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2522983</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:10:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2522983</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Privacy, please</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1717065&amp;cid=t_208294_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F08%2Fprivacy-please.html</link>
            <description>A weekend trip to Maine for a family wedding turned into a business trip (and a tax deduction) when I was reminded that the 16th National HIPAA Summit and related Privacy Symposium were taking place at Harvard University this week. Since I was flying in and out of Boston, I hesitantly forked over the $150 extortion—er, change—fee to American Airlines and sprung for a hotel room, mostly so I could attend a heated debate—er, “roundtable discussion” (even though the table was not round)—about whether patient privacy rules were effective.I’m pretty sure it was worth the money. Boston usually is. While in the area, I also got a tour of athenahealth’s Watertown headquarters. I learned that “chief athenista” and new daddy Todd Park is on paternity leave for the next several mo...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1717065</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1717065</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

