<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: heuristics</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'heuristics'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22heuristics%22&t=%22heuristics%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:38:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Critical Thinking: What is True and What to Do</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4338023&amp;cid=t_149531_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F01%2F12%2Fcritical-thinking-what-is-true-and-what-to-do%2F</link>
            <description>Many researchers suggest that a key characteristic of critical thinking is the ability to recognize one’s own fallibility when evaluating and generating evidence &amp;#8212; recognizing the danger of weighing evidence according to one’s own beliefs.  The expanding literature on informal reasoning emphasizes the importance of detaching one’s own beliefs from the process of argument evaluation (Kuhn, 2007; Stanovich &amp; Stanovich, 2010).
The emphasis placed on unbiased reasoning processes has led researchers to highlight the importance of decontextualized reasoning.  For example (Stanovich &amp; Stanovich, 2010, p. 196):
Kelley (1990) argues that &amp;#8220;the ability to step back from our train of thought . . . . is a virtue because it is the only way to check the results of our thinking...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4338023</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:24:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4338023</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Situation of Financial Markets</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542678&amp;cid=t_149531_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2F07%2Fmind-over-money-nova-pbs-video%2F</link>
            <description>Below the jump you can watch an outstanding and fascinating  video episode, &amp;#8220;Mind over Money,&amp;#8221; by PBS&amp;#8217;s NOVA, that asks the question &amp;#8220;Can markets be rational when humans aren&amp;#8217;t?&amp;#8221; and that includes significant segments describing some of the work by Situationist friend Jennifer Lerner.
(We&amp;#8217;ve placed the (52 minute) video after the jump because it plays automatically.)

* * *


* * *
For more detailed information relevant to the episode, you can click on the following links.
 The Disposition Effect
Trust your gut when trading stocks? Do no such thing, argues David Adler, producer of &amp;#8220;Mind Over Money.&amp;#8221;
 The Deciding Factor
A new study at Harvard is exploring how emotions affect our decisions, whether we like it or not.
 TV Program Descrip...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542678</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 04:01:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542678</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence - Abstract</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1933484&amp;cid=t_149531_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F11%2F05%2Fmoral-grammar-and-intuitive-jurisprudence-abstract%2F</link>
            <description>John Mikhail&amp;#8217;s recently posted his forthcoming chapter, &amp;#8220;Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence: A Formal Model of Unconscious Moral and Legal Knowledge&amp;#8221; (forthcoming in The Psychology of Learning and Motiation: Moral Cognition and Decision Making (D. Medin, L. Skitka, C. W. Bauman, D. Bartels, eds., 2009) on SSRN.  Here&amp;#8217;s the abstract.

* * *
Could a computer be programmed to make moral judgments about cases of intentional harm and unreasonable risk that match those judgments people already make intuitively? If the human moral sense is an unconscious computational mechanism of some sort, as many cognitive scientists have suggested, then the answer should be yes. So too if the search for reflective equilibrium is a sound enterprise, since achieving this state of...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1933484</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:01:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1933484</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More on heuristics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=917855&amp;cid=t_149531_86_f&amp;fid=34466&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalevidence.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F10%2Fmore-on-heuristics.html</link>
            <description>The cognitive psychology Thinker has a few great minitutorials that give examples illustrating some of the most common heuristics.From the site overview:A number of factors can affect how we go about making decisions, but it is unusual for us to make a decision completely objectively and rationally; rather we usually bring biases from our prior beliefs or experiences into the situation. As a result, we often use &quot;rules of thumb,&quot; or heuristics, to help us. These heuristics allow us to have an idea about how to weigh our options, even though they might sometimes lead us astray. Likewise, sometimes the way our options are worded, or &quot;framed,&quot; may lead us to think differently than we might otherwise. Finally, we often allow prior experience or outcomes to guide our approach to a decision, eve...</description>
            <author>Clinical Evidence, Searching Tidbits, and Other Minutiae</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=917855</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">917855</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Representativeness bias</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=917856&amp;cid=t_149531_86_f&amp;fid=34466&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalevidence.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F10%2Frepresentativeness-bias.html</link>
            <description>This week's AMNews, the newsletter of the American Medical Association, includes an excerpt from Dr. Jerome Groopman's book How Doctors Think (amazon.com book info). The excerpt discusses a case of missed diagnosis of cardiac disease in a healthy man and gives a great example of the representativeness heuristic in clinical decision-making.Groopman notes of the case and how it illustrates this kind of bias:The mistake Croskerry made is called a representativeness error: yourthinking is guided by a prototype, so you fail to consider possibilities thatcontradict the prototype and thus attribute the symptoms to the wrongcause. (Source: Clinical Evidence, Searching Tidbits, and Other Minutiae)</description>
            <author>Clinical Evidence, Searching Tidbits, and Other Minutiae</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=917856</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:13:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">917856</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Do You Go With Your Gut?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=825473&amp;cid=t_149531_133_f&amp;fid=35096&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAutismVox%2F%7E3%2F149171395%2F</link>
            <description>When you make a big, a crucial decision&amp;#8212;about what therapy is best for your autistic child, about whether or not you should uproot your family to move to a school district that (you hear) offers good autism services, about whether you should hire a therapist who you just don&amp;#8217;t feel &amp;#8220;right&amp;#8221; about&amp;#8212;do you go with your gut, even after factoring in scientific evidence and research and trying to think objectively?
Here&amp;#8217;s what Gerd Gigerenzer, a German social psychologist and the Director of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, has to say about gut thinking in the August 28th New York Times:
 It’s a judgment that is fast. It comes quickly into a person’s consciousness. The person doesn’t know why they have this feeling. Yet, this is s...</description>
            <author>Autism Vox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=825473</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:59:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">825473</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

