<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: hippocratic oath</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'hippocratic oath'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22hippocratic+oath%22&t=%22hippocratic+oath%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:59:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>The Best Wrinkle Creams Won’t Be Advertised in Magazines</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3678668&amp;cid=t_145127_160_f&amp;fid=36189&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skinmdblog.com%2F174%2Fthe-best-wrinkle-creams-wont-be-advertised-in-magazines%2F</link>
            <description>The best anti wrinkle creams  according to independent scientists  are those that contain  natural compounds.  It doesn’t matter what designer or celebrity is promoting the products.   They get paid to do that anyway.   All that matters is the ingredients the product contains.
The ingredients that work  include Shea butter, avocado extract,  the protein functional keratin, grape seed oil, vitamin e, CoenzymeQ10&amp;#8230;notice a pattern?  All of these compounds  are naturally occurring, not created synthetically using petrochemicals.
The safest skincare products are always the ones that contain no chemical fragrance or preservatives.   The skin care  companies try to make everyone think that artificial preservatives are essential to extend shelf-life, but the truth is this.   Natural ...</description>
            <author>Skin MD</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3678668</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:53:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3678668</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pushing Doctors into a &quot;Dual Mandate&quot; and the &quot;Attack on Doctors' Hippocratic Oath&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2382300&amp;cid=t_145127_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F05%2Fpushing-doctors-into-dual-mandate-and.html</link>
            <description>Physicians are being pushed steadily into an untenable position. On one hand, they are professionally obligated to render optimal care to each patient based on individual need. On the other hand, they are increasingly being looked to by bureaucrats and bioethicists as serving another role--for society--as the rationing arms of cost control.The effect of this would require doctors to give optimal care to some patients but not others, probably based on mandatory invidiously discriminatory categories of age, disability, perhaps even politically incorrect lifestyles such as smoking and obesity (but never, for example culturally acceptable risky behaviors like promiscuity). This dual mandate, if adopted, would place doctors and other health care professionals in a terrible conflict of interest-...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2382300</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:23:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2382300</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>&quot;Choice&quot; is a One Way Street</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2112157&amp;cid=t_145127_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F01%2Fchoce-is-one-way-street.html</link>
            <description>As I have often said, the culture of death brooks no dissent. The Bush &quot;conscience clause&quot; regulations protecting health care workers from being discriminated against in their employment for refusing to participate in medical procedures with which they disagree on religious or moral grounds, has been attacked in court by six states. From the story:In filing the lawsuit, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is seeking an injunction to stop the Provider Conscience Rule from taking effect. The lawsuit also asks the court to invalidate the regulation.Blumenthal said the rule would allow health care providers or pharmacists to deny a patient medical care without explanation or offering the patient a referral or information on alternatives, upsetting the balance between health providers' religiou...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2112157</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:19:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2112157</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Revisionism Alert! Trying to Explain Away Changes in the Hippocratic Oath</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1908704&amp;cid=t_145127_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2008%2F10%2Frevisionism-alert-trying-to-explain.html</link>
            <description>This is revisionism on steroids. The Hippocratic Oath is no longer taken by most doctors because it has some politically incorrect clauses, such as barring physicians from mercy killing patients, abortion, and sex with patients. I have written about those matters here at SHS before. But now an ethicist writing for the BBC tries to tell us that the Oath really didn't ban assisted suicide or abortion. From the article: The next part seemingly concerns euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, saying: &quot;And I will not give a drug that is deadly to anyone if asked, nor will I suggest the way to such a counsel.&quot;Two leading scholars of the Oath, Littre and Miles, have however suggested that this passage alludes to the then common practice of using doctors as skilled political assassins. Steven Mi...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1908704</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1908704</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Physicians and Their Role in Executions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1146096&amp;cid=t_145127_90_f&amp;fid=34499&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fcalifmedicineman.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F01%2Fphysicians-and-their-role-in-executions.html</link>
            <description>The New England Journal of Medicine has published a provocative editorial on capital punishment and the physician's role in carrying it out.Read my thoughts on this important editorial here.The New England Journal of Medicine has published a provocative editorial on capital punishment and the physician's role in carrying it out. In truth, the position taken, that no physician should agree to facilitate an execution is old and has been endorsed by many medical societies. However, in over 1,000 words, the closest thing to an argument in support of this are these words: &quot;A profession dedicated to healing the sick has no place in the process of execution.&quot;Yet even this statement is offered without proof or justification and is merely a recapitulation of the authors' opinion. Cannot the exact o...</description>
            <author>California Medicine Man</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1146096</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:01:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1146096</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

