<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: hit policy committee</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'hit policy committee'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22hit+policy+committee%22&t=%22hit+policy+committee%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:55:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>More on Stage 2: Clinical Quality Measure Reporting – Meaningful Use Monday</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5159280&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FTRWtDdOJM_4%2F</link>
            <description>Lynn Scheps is Vice President, Government Affairs at EHR vendor SRSsoft. In this role, Lynn has been a Voice of Physicians and SRSsoft users in Washington during the formulation of the meaningful use criteria. Lynn is currently working to assist SRSsoft users interested in showing meaningful use and receiving the EHR incentive money. Check out Lynn&amp;#8217;s previous Meaningful Use Monday posts.
In addition to the Meaningful Use Stage 2 recommendations discussed in last week’s Meaningful Use Monday, the HIT Policy Committee proposed a new framework for the reporting of clinical quality measures that was designed by its specifically-tasked Quality Measure Workgroup. The recommended concept is depicted in the graphic below—the intention is to broaden the scope of reporting to address a wid...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5159280</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:19:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5159280</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What’s in Store for Meaningful Use Stage 2? – Meaningful Use Monday</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5130856&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2F7izZd7JZcgo%2F</link>
            <description>Lynn Scheps is Vice President, Government Affairs at EHR vendor SRSsoft. In this role, Lynn has been a Voice of Physicians and SRSsoft users in Washington during the formulation of the meaningful use criteria. Lynn is currently working to assist SRSsoft users interested in showing meaningful use and receiving the EHR incentive money. Check out Lynn&amp;#8217;s previous Meaningful Use Monday posts.
A few weeks ago, the HIT Policy Committee forwarded its Stage 2 meaningful use recommendations to CMS. CMS is expected to issue a Proposed Rule in early 2012 and the Final Rule in mid-2012. 
The first recommendation—intensely debated, but overwhelmingly supported in the end—is to delay the start of Stage 2 until 2014, recognizing the unrealistic time pressure that vendors and providers would fac...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5130856</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:43:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5130856</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Preliminary Meaningful Use Details Out</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5107647&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2011%2F08%2F05%2Fpreliminary-meaningful-use-details-out%2F</link>
            <description>Brian Ahier has a great post up that had the presentation and report (embedded below) that CMS provided to the HIT Policy Committee. It has a lot of great information worth talking about. I&amp;#8217;m going to embed the presentation and report below and pull out some of the key points in a post later. Let me know what catches your eye.
The CMS Meaningful Use Presentation

The CMS Meaningful Use Report



Related posts:Meaningful Use Mondays &amp;#8211; More 90 Day Reporting Period Details As a follow-up to last week’s Meaningful Use Monday, the...
Meaningful Use Measures: Electronic Copy of Health Information – Meaningful Use Monday Meaningful Use Core Measure: More than 50% of all patients...
Helpful Meaningful Use Resources – Meaningful Use Monday I spend a lot of my day answering questio...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5107647</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:38:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5107647</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Federal Advisory Committee Blog (FACA Blog)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2954609&amp;cid=t_234114_114_f&amp;fid=34646&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthit.hhs.gov%2Fportal%2Fserver.pt%2Fgateway%2FPTARGS_0_11113_890784_0_0_18%2FHIT%2520Standards%2520Cmte_Transmittal_8-20-09.pdf</link>
            <description>The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) has launched a new blog called the Federal Advisory Committee Blog (FACA Blog).The initial post by Judy Sparrow discusses that the FACA Blog will be uses in a spirit of transparency and collaboration to help open a broader dialogue on the issues before the Health IT Standards Committee and the Health IT Policy Committee. The post also provides some background on the role that Federal Advisory Groups play under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.The second post by Aneesh Chopra, Federal Chief Technology Officer, spells out the planned process for an open conversation that will take place over the next couple of weeks with various committee members blogging about a variety of topics (Proposed Standards, Interop...</description>
            <author>Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2954609</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:08:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2954609</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ONC Blog – Federal Advisory Committee – Judy Sparrow</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2950810&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FtE2kF5Y_eLo%2F</link>
            <description>All I can say is that it&amp;#8217;s very cool that ONC now has a blog. This is probably right up there with when I found past HHS secretary Mike Leavitt&amp;#8217;s blog. Ok, yes I am a complete blog nerd. At least I&amp;#8217;m able to admit it up front.
Basically, Judy Sparrow has just done an introduction post where she talks about the Federal Advisory Committees and their role at ONC. She&amp;#8217;s the ONC liason for these committees and so hopefully she&amp;#8217;ll keep us updated on progress with these two very important committees. She also provides this explanation about the committees in her first ONC blog post:
“FACAs” get their name from the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which lays out the guidelines for such committees. FACAs are advisory and intended to provide external guidance to the ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2950810</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:00:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2950810</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HIT Policy Committee Meeting on Certified EHR</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2793253&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2009%2F09%2F11%2Fhit-policy-committee-meeting-on-certified-ehr%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve been meaning to post about the HIT Policy Committee meeting for a month or so now. The reason I didn&amp;#8217;t is that when I post about things like this, I like to make sure that I&amp;#8217;ve had a chance to digest the information and provide some thoughtful analysis and commentary on what&amp;#8217;s happening. Of course, thoughtful analysis and commentary takes a lot more work and time and so thus the delay. Enough about me&amp;#8230;
Yes, on August 14th the HIT Policy Committee met to mostly talk about what certified EHR will mean under ARRA. You can see the full powerpoint from the presentation here. Luckily, CCHIT (I guess they have an interest in the topic) wrote a pretty good summary of what was said about EHR certification at the meeting (with a few of my own modifications):

There...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2793253</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:15:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2793253</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Marc Probst Talks About Meaningful Use</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2662558&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FgemlcZp0t6s%2F</link>
            <description>A relatively new reader of EMR and HIPAA, Michael Archuleta, sent me his notes from the Utah Medical Group Managers Association 6/25/09 where the keynote speaker was Marc Probst. For those that don&amp;#8217;t know, Marc Probst is the CIO of Intermountain Healthcare (IHC). IHC is huge in Utah and I think it does pretty well in a number of surrounding states as well. Plus, Marc Probst is also a member of the HIT Policy Committee. You may remember that I&amp;#8217;ve talked about Marc Probst on EMR and HIPAA a few times before.
Anyway, I found some of the points that Michael captured interesting. I guess in the end I was interested to hear what Marc Probst was telling people. Michael Archuleta&amp;#8217;s notes are as follows (published with permission and the emphasis added was mine to highlight some i...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2662558</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:45:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2662558</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simple Plan for Meaningful EHR Use</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2637881&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FMOdN01pvbl8%2F</link>
            <description>Yes, I&amp;#8217;m still on my kick of asking the question of why we&amp;#8217;re making the definition of meaningful use so complicated. Certainly I could make an ambitious goal of every doctor having to document everything granularly and electronically and share everything with everyone so we give the best care possible to patients. The reality is that if you do that, then no one will care about meaningful use and the EHR stimulus money will go unspent.
Certainly the above is a bit of an exaggeration, but I can&amp;#8217;t help but ask myself if the definition of &amp;#8220;meaningful use&amp;#8221; isn&amp;#8217;t so ambitious that the above will be the net result (at least for small practices) of the current definition of meaningful use.
It&amp;#8217;s a little bit wrong for me to say it&amp;#8217;s too complex, but ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2637881</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:12:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2637881</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will HHS Do Any Better at EHR Certification Than CCHIT?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2630206&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FWqNz6OcJbAw%2F</link>
            <description>Now that the HIT Policy committee has marginalized CCHIT EHR certification and proposed that HHS define the EHR certification criteria, it only seems reasonable to ask whether HHS will do a much better job than CCHIT did at defining &amp;#8220;certified EHR.&amp;#8221;
What has me a little concerned is the process the work they&amp;#8217;ve done in creating the meaningful use guidelines. They are too complicated and I believe will leave us with a lot of unhappy doctors. It makes me wonder if the same will happen with defining the EHR certification criteria. A few things do give me hope.
First, the HIT policy committee&amp;#8217;s suggestion is for the EHR certification to remain focused on just those things which are applicable to the EHR stimulus money. This should provide HHS with an advantage over CCHI...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2630206</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:48:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2630206</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use Gets More Complex</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2621884&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FGsC5Ed1Fxbg%2F</link>
            <description>I posted previously a short summary of the changes to meaningful use in the final meaningful use matrix presented at the HIT policy committee meeting. As I&amp;#8217;ve thought about these changes this weekend, I couldn&amp;#8217;t help but remember the major problem I (and many others) had with the original meaningful use criteria being too complex.
My argument then was that the 22 meaningful use criteria as a collective whole were too much for a doctor&amp;#8217;s office to complete in the current time frame. Unfortunately, it seems that the HIT policy committee has chosen to only make slight simplifications of the meaningful use matrix for hospitals (For inpatient CPOE, only 10% of orders must be entered electronically) and has actually added to the EMR requirements for ambulatory clinics.
I do thi...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2621884</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:10:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2621884</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ONC HIT Policy Committee Meeting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2615394&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FnQZKzRDsdnY%2F</link>
            <description>I read that the HIT Policy Committee meeting that happened on July 16, 2009 was a &amp;#8220;big one&amp;#8221; according to Chilmark Research. He said that &amp;#8220;the committee went from hearing revised recommendations for Meaningful Use, to recommendations from the HIE workgroup and lastly recommendations regarding certification processes for EHRs.&amp;#8221;
I was unfortunately tied up doing a presentation on ARRA EHR Stimulus money and so I wasn&amp;#8217;t able to follow the event live (or on one of my twitter accounts). I know that Chilmark is planning to do some posts and I&amp;#8217;m looking forward to those.
I also found this short summary from John Halamka about the changes to meaningful use in the final definition:
1. For inpatient CPOE, only 10% of orders must be entered electronically
2. For pro...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2615394</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:37:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2615394</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Providing Feedback on Meaningful Use Matrix</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2553115&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2009%2F06%2F25%2Fproviding-feedback-on-meaningful-use-matrix%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;d been meaning to post this when the meaningful use document came out, but didn&amp;#8217;t get around to it until now. ONC has asked for public comment on the preliminary definition of &amp;#8220;meaningful use&amp;#8221; as presented by the HIT policy Committee (see the Meaningful Use Matrix). Submissions are due by 5 pm est June 26, 2009, and should be no more than 2,000 words in length (per the HHS HIT website).
I encourage everyone involved in Helathcare IT to submit their thoughts on meaningful use. I&amp;#8217;m a big believer in leveraging the knowledge of crowds to make something better. I believe that if you amass enough smart people on something, you usually get a pretty good result. Assuming that they listen.
I&amp;#8217;d also certainly welcome people to post their submissions in the comm...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2553115</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:52:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2553115</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use Matrix from HIT Policy Committee</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2553116&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2009%2F06%2F24%2Fmeaningful-use-matrix-from-hit-policy-committee%2F</link>
            <description>As I first looked over the meaningful use matrix (PDF) that was created by the HIT policy committee I thought that the requirements listed were reasonable and doable. Then, I realized that I was only looking at the first page of a seven page document.
For now, I&amp;#8217;ve focused on looking at the 2011 objectives. I wanted to really focus on it since that&amp;#8217;s the bar with the most stringent timeline for those wanting to get the EHR stimulus money from ARRA.
I&amp;#8217;ll talk in more detail about the various items in a future post. However, as I look through the list of objectives to show meaningful use for 2011, I don&amp;#8217;t think any of them sound unreasonable. On their own, each objective listed seems to be something that is completely doable. I might question why some are on the list,...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2553116</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:07:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2553116</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New EHR Certification Pathways from CCHIT</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2523212&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FSaiG6cX0Wv8%2F</link>
            <description>I participated in both of the CCHIT &amp;#8220;town calls&amp;#8221; that happened this morning and yesterday. I did miss the beginning of today&amp;#8217;s call, but looking through the slides it looks like the presentation was more or less the same for both town calls. You can see the slides from both CCHIT presentations here. Between this and the HIT Policy Committee meeting yesterday there&amp;#8217;s almost too much to digest. So, in my regular fashion I&amp;#8217;m going to break down my analysis into lots of bite sized chunks.
The biggest change that was proposed/announced during the CCHIT meeting was three EHR certification pathways:
EHR-C: Certified EHR Comprehensive
EHR-M: Certified EHR Module
EHR-S: Certified EHR Site
Basically, the EHR-C is the same certification that CCHIT has been doing since th...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2523212</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:26:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2523212</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use Draft Document</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2473623&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2Ffedg2KK4tNM%2F</link>
            <description>The healthcare IT airwaves are abuzz with the date of June 16th.  That&amp;#8217;s the date that they say we should get more indications on how the government is going to define the all important term &amp;#8220;meaningful use.&amp;#8221;  Here&amp;#8217;s a short quote from John Halamka about the meaningful use dates:
On June 16th, the Quality workgroup will receive meaningful use guidance from the HIT Policy Committee. We&amp;#8217;ll work hard over the following week and will present our strawman standards, implementation guidance, and certification criteria at the June 23rd public meeting of the HIT Standards Workgroup. We&amp;#8217;ll continue to refine the matrix in July and complete our work in August.
John Halamka also described the format for the HIT Standards Committee&amp;#8217;s meaningful use document:...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2473623</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:07:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2473623</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bloggers Impact On EMR Adoption</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2408548&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FWk2JkDjgXuA%2F</link>
            <description>As I&amp;#8217;ve been writing and reading about ARRA and the HITECH Act, I&amp;#8217;ve had a few moments to consider the impact that things like the HIT Policy Committee will have on the future of EMR adoption in the US. Between that committee, ONCHIT and HHS the decisions they make will have far reaching impact on EHR adoption. I&amp;#8217;ll leave the question of whether they&amp;#8217;ll have a good or bad impact to another post.
Instead, I couldn&amp;#8217;t help but wonder what impact bloggers and various EMR related websites and forums can have on EMR adoption. More specifically, I&amp;#8217;ve been asking myself what kind of impact does this blog have on overall EMR adoption including both selection and implementation. Maybe I should be asking myself the question of how much impact could EMR bloggers hav...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2408548</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:20:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2408548</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Great Marc Probst Interview</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2382593&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FX2ItRyp8LkA%2F</link>
            <description>Marc Probst, CIO at Intermountain Healthcare and member of the new Health Information Technology Policy Committee, gave a really interesting interview to Healthcare Informatics. I really don&amp;#8217;t know Marc Probst other than what I read in this interview, but I do know something about Intermountain Healthcare (or IHC as it&amp;#8217;s known in Utah). When I was in high school I actually worked for IHC spending one hour a day cleaning a local doctors office. I&amp;#8217;m glad those days are over and I don&amp;#8217;t think I did a very good job at it either.
However, from that experience and also my high school friend&amp;#8217;s dad being the CEO of IHC I got to know the company pretty well. I was really impressed with how the company was run. From the above interview I think that Marc Probst probably ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2382593</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 23:11:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2382593</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HIT Policy Committee Has No Small Practice Representation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2314671&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FPZgGIfDuOyc%2F</link>
            <description>One of my loyal readers and colleagues in the EHR field recently sent me a link (pdf) to the list of members that were announced on the Health Information Technology (HIT) Committee. Take a look at the list of members on the HIT Policy Committee:

Christine Bechtel, vice president, National Partnership for Woman and Families
Arthur Davidson, director, Public Health Informatics, Denver Public Health Department; director, Denver Center for Public Health Preparedness; medical epidemiologist; director, HIV/AIDS Surveillance, City and County of Denver
Adam Clark, research and policy director, Lance Armstrong Foundation
Marc Probst, chief information officer, Intermountain Healthcare
Paul Tang, vice president and chief medical information officer, Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Scott White, assist...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2314671</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:30:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2314671</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>GAO picks first 13 members of HIT Policy Committee</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2314692&amp;cid=t_234114_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fgao-picks-first-13-members-of-hit.html</link>
            <description>The Government Accountability Office today named the first 13 members of the Health Information Technology Policy Committee, one of the new advisory boards called for in the stimulus legislation. The appointments fall under 10 categories: Advocates for Patients or Consumers1. Christine Bechtel, Washington, D.C. (3-year term) Vice President, National Partnership for Women &amp; Families 2. Arthur Davidson, M.D., Denver (2-year term) Denver Public Health Department; Director, Public Health Informatics; Director, Denver Center for Public Health Preparedness; Medical epidemiologist; Director, HIV/AIDS Surveillance, City and County of Denver 3. Adam Clark, Ph.D., Austin, Texas (1-year term) Director of Research and Policy, Lance Armstrong Foundation Representatives of Health Care Providers, includi...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2314692</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:21:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2314692</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

