<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: hpv human papilloma virus</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'hpv human papilloma virus'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22hpv+human+papilloma+virus%22&t=%22hpv+human+papilloma+virus%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:58:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Removing Warts with Duct Tape!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542903&amp;cid=t_452895_160_f&amp;fid=36189&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skinmdblog.com%2F56%2Fremoving-warts-with-duct-tape%2F</link>
            <description>Common warts are thickened, crusty lesions with noticeable black pinpoint dots. Contrary to what most people think, these aren’t caused by frog’s urine.
They are caused by a virus called the human papilloma virus (HPV). There are a lot of ways to get rid of these pesky lesions but every technique aims to destroy the virus.
You can apply an over-the-counter salicylic acid gel or solution, freeze it with liquid nitrogen, zap it with a laser or have it cauterized but I think the cheapest way to do it is to use duct tape. That’s right, DUCT TAPE!.
Simply cut a piece of duct tape and apply it on the wart then leave it on for 7 days. On the eighth day, take it off and repeat the process until the wart disappears.
It may take a month or two for it to completely resolve . This isn’t a guar...</description>
            <author>Skin MD</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542903</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:44:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542903</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>10 Tips for Reducing Cancer Risk</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3015350&amp;cid=t_452895_111_f&amp;fid=36048&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAHeartyLife%2F%7E3%2FJDJIS71p_bc%2F</link>
            <description>While we can&amp;#8217;t always prevent cancer, we can do things to help reduce the risk of developing it. Of course, we always hear: eat healthy foods, exercise, don&amp;#8217;t smoke. But the message doesn&amp;#8217;t seem to be getting through because people still eat junk or high fat foods, still don&amp;#8217;t exercise and still smoke.
The Mayo Clinic published 10 tips to reduce cancer risk in their most recent issue of Mayo Clinic Women&amp;#8217;s HealthSource.
Here are the tips and below there&amp;#8217;s more explanation:

Stop smoking
Limit alcohol intake &amp;#8211; some alcohol is okay, too much is not
Follow recommended intake of fruits and vegetable (daily!)
Decrease the amount of fat in your daily diet
Lose weight if you&amp;#8217;re too heavy, try to gain weight if you&amp;#8217;re too thin
Move! Get active
...</description>
            <author>A Hearty Life</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3015350</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:12:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3015350</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google runs anti-vaccination ads</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2307452&amp;cid=t_452895_88_f&amp;fid=38129&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsandnsurf.medbrains.net%2F2009%2F04%2Fgoogle-runs-anti-vaccination-ads%2F</link>
            <description>6minutes.com.au&amp;#8217;s Jared Reed recently highlighted the questionable nature of some the Google-sponsored health ads that have proliferated all over the Internet. In the comments section raged a slightly over-the-top arm wrestle between some anti-vaccinationists and a GP from Nowra&amp;#8230;
I chimed in with a comment:
I generally try to avoid having battles of wits with unarmed opponents [...] (Source: Life in the Fast Lane)</description>
            <author>Life in the Fast Lane</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2307452</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:05:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2307452</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Gardasil really for everyone?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1729474&amp;cid=t_452895_105_f&amp;fid=35048&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FMedicineAndMan%2F%7E3%2F373063230%2F</link>
            <description>More proof that we need extended studies before blanket recommendations are made for targeting the entire population rather than &amp;#8220;high risk&amp;#8221; (in this case most likely to benefit) group.
A new study suggests that giving Merck &amp; Co.&amp;#8217;s cervical-cancer vaccine Gardasil to women through their mid-20s may not be worth the price, despite U.S. recommendations that this age group receive the costly shot.
The study, published online Wednesday by The New England Journal of Medicine, comes as Merck already is having difficulty persuading college-age and older women to get the vaccine, which was introduced in 2006 and costs about $360 for a three-dose regimen. This has contributed to a slowdown in Gardasil sales, casting a cloud on Merck&amp;#8217;s financial outlook.
Study Questions ...</description>
            <author>Medicine and Man</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1729474</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:15:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1729474</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

