<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: icd 10</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'icd 10'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22icd+10%22&t=%22icd+10%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:14:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Top Considerations for Transitioning to ICD-10 – Guest Post</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5181960&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FGFmRr9VJvx8%2F</link>
            <description>Chuck Podesta is Fletcher Allen Health Care’s chief information officer.

ICD-10 would not be so daunting if the deadline was not occurring during the rush to get EHRs for meaningful use. Add in value-based purchasing, bundled payments and transitioning to ACOs, and you can see why many CIOs are retiring early or migrating to the vendor or consulting world. We are just over two years away from the October 2013 deadline, and there is much work to be done. ICD-10 contains 68,000 codes, as opposed to the 13,000 currently used in the ICD-9 world. There is a code for every condition that exists on the planet.
The revenue cycle system, which includes registration, HIM and billing/AR, will be the lynch pin to ICD-10 readiness. Having a solid vendor partner and a strong product is key to a succ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5181960</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:56:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5181960</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Doctors &amp; Documentation: How to get physicians on board with ICD-10 initiatives</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5159315&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fdoctors-documentation-how-get-physicians-board-icd-10-initiatives</link>
            <description>ICD-10 implementation is a problem that affects how physicians will practice medicine. But just how to you persuade them that they need to get involved in the training and planning now?
The first thing you do is put a physician on the ICD-10 steering committee. That physician is going to be your champion who gets his or her peers to understand and support the changes needed.
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5159315</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:56:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5159315</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD-10 Implementation: How to anticipate what needs to change</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5050825&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Ficd-10-implementation-how-anticipate-what-needs-change</link>
            <description>Hopefully I have persuaded you that the change from ICD-9 codes to ICD-10 codes is big. But it may surprise you to learn it may be less intimidating than you think.
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5050825</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:41:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5050825</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mostashari Plays Good Cop, Unintentionally Making CMS Look Inflexible</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5062331&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Fneil%2F2011%2F07%2F14%2Fmostashari-plays-good-cop-unintentionally-making-cms-look-inflexible%2F</link>
            <description>Probably unintentionally, it seems like various HHS branches are playing good cop-bad cop right now.
I&amp;#8217;m in Ojai, Calif., right now (please don&amp;#8217;t hate me because of it) for the annual Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems (AMDIS) Physician-Computer Connection meeting, a gathering of chief medical information officers and others in the field of what AMDIS likes to call applied medical informatics. That contrasts with the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), which tends to draw more from the academic side.
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) apparently is the good cop. National health IT coordinator Dr. Farzad Mostashari was unable to make it out here from Washington, but he addressed the gathering by teleph...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5062331</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:53:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5062331</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMRs, ICD-10 Pave the Way to Business Intelligence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4953046&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2F3WSCeHECGNo%2F</link>
            <description>Two articles I&amp;#8217;ve written in the last 24 hours have gotten me thinking that we&amp;#8217;ve already entered the post-implementation era of EMRs, even as implementation remains in progress at so many healthcare organizations. While the vast majority of hospitals and physician practices in the U.S. still don&amp;#8217;t have full-featured EMRs in place, many are already looking well into the future.
As you may already know, HIMSS on Tuesday released its first-ever survey on &amp;#8220;clinical transformation.&amp;#8221; According to HIMSS and survey sponsor McKesson, &amp;#8220;Clinical transformation involves assessing and continually improving the way patient care is delivered at all levels in a care delivery organization. It occurs when an organization rejects existing practice patterns that deliver in...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4953046</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:59:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4953046</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Top Five for ICD-10</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4841669&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Ftop-five-icd-10</link>
            <description>As the buzz at HIMSS this year indicated, ICD-10 is on the short list of things keeping hospital executives up at night. From 17,000 codes under ICD-9 to 155,000 under the new regulation, ICD-10 takes coding and reimbursement to a whole new level &amp;ndash; and will exponentially impact the financial health of every hospital. Here is what every provider needs to know as they prepare for the transition:
&amp;nbsp;

  
      
          No sticky    
    

read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4841669</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:14:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4841669</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>After ICD-10, will coders ever regain ICD-9 efficiency levels?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4636528&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fafter-icd-10-will-coders-ever-regain-icd-9-efficiency-levels</link>
            <description>If anyone is suggesting that ICD-10 will not create a productivity drop in the days after compliance, they must be practicing silent protest. Most experts agree that come the flip-switch October 1, 2013 compliance deadline even seasoned, well-trained coders will take longer with the ICD-10 than they did with ICD-9. The overarching question is whether or not coders will master ICD-10 and, in so doing, resume ICD-9-era productivity?
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4636528</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:22:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4636528</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Don't let customized applications snarl cash flow during ICD-10 conversion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4532318&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fdont-let-customized-applications-snarl-cash-flow-during-icd-10-conversion</link>
            <description>Most healthcare organizations have modified or customized their billing applications to meet their own unique needs in regard to payer mix, clinical programs, or provider-based billing arrangements. While these customizations are fine for their intended purposes, they nonetheless pose rather large obstacles to the ICD-10 code conversion process.
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4532318</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:48:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4532318</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Video: athenahealth’s Jonathan Bush at HIMSS11</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4545031&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fv%2FNnYiPbIAzEQ%3Fhl%3Den%26amp%3Bfs%3D1</link>
            <description>As has become custom at HIMSS, I sat down with Jonathan Bush, chairman, CEO and president of athenahealth, at the 2011 conference in Orlando, Fla., last week. But due to some technical difficulties in getting the room we thought we had reserved and in getting my audio recorder to work (OK, OK, I didn&amp;#8217;t have fresh batteries on me), I busted out the HD video camera. (Wouldn&amp;#8217;t you know, the battery was losing steam there, too, so I had to plug the camera in. I have since determined that the USB port wasn&amp;#8217;t working, so I exchanged it this past weekend. But I seriously digress.)
In this interview, we talk athena&amp;#8217;s business, meaningful use, 5010/ICD-10, ACOs, cloud computing and health reform. We poke a little fun at the &amp;#8220;boat show&amp;#8221; that the vendor expo has be...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4545031</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:00:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4545031</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>7 tactics for making ICD-10 urgent</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4455332&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2F7-tactics-making-icd-10-urgent</link>
            <description>What with meaningful use, EHRs, HIPAA 5010, and countless other healthcare projects, ICD-10 is on the backburner at many organizations. Yet, the deadline is approaching, achieving compliance is more complex than it may appear and the time is here to move ICD-10 up that priority list.
With that in mind, two executives at Care Communications, a health information management consultancy, share their collective advice on raising the ICD-10 conversion's profile amid the din.
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4455332</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:38:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4455332</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Survey: One-third of health organizations not ready for HIPAA 5010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4424303&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fsurvey-one-third-health-organizations-not-ready-hipaa-5010</link>
            <description>Even with less than a year left until the compliance deadline &amp;ndash; and monetary reimbursement on the line &amp;ndash; a disconcerting number of healthcare entities indicated that they are not yet prepared for HIPAA 5010.
HIMSS most recent ICD-10/5010 Readiness Survey, in fact, determined that among respondents &amp;ldquo;one third report they either don&amp;rsquo;t have a plan for [HIPAA 5010] testing, or won&amp;rsquo;t test until the fourth quarter of this year.&amp;rdquo;
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4424303</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:27:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4424303</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use: Are All your Bases Covered?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4331083&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fmeaningful-use-are-all-your-bases-covered%25E2%2580%25A8</link>
            <description>On the surface, proving &amp;ldquo;meaningful use&amp;rdquo; (MU) of an electronic health record (EHR), at least the bare minimum required to receive federal funding in 2011, doesn&amp;rsquo;t appear to be overly complicated. Upon closer inspection, however, certain details outlined in requirements may not be as easy to comply with as previously thought.
read more (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4331083</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:50:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4331083</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top 5 ICD-10 cost-savings categories</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4265929&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Ftop-5-icd-10-cost-savings-categories</link>
            <description>Given that ICD-10 compliance day is still nearly three years from now, most of the chatter about a total industry-wide sum for new code sets has leaned toward projecting an overall cost. But there's a flip-side: the cost-savings that converting to ICD-10 will bring the healthcare realm &amp;ndash; and to the tune of billions of dollars. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4265929</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:20:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4265929</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>WEDI, NCHICA revamp ICD-10 timeline</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4219844&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fwedi-nchica-revamp-icd-10-timeline</link>
            <description>What with many healthcare entities already so far behind on both HIPAA 5010 and ICD-10 implementations as to render industry timelines almost worthless, WEDI and NCHICA reworked their recommendation. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4219844</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:45:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4219844</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nine ways ICD-10 will better your business</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4119198&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fnine-ways-icd-10-will-better-your-business</link>
            <description>The healthcare industry might not yet realize this simple fact: Although this does not garner much in the way of media attention, ICD-10 promises to improve the business of healthcare in numerous ways.
Despite the cost, expanse, and overwhelming transformation payers and providers will have to undertake to achieve ICD-10 compliance, ultimately it will be a boon for both healthcare in America and those organizations that serve up that care. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4119198</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:15:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4119198</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>McKesson's three ICD-10 myths</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4065449&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fmckessons-three-icd-10-myths</link>
            <description>McKesson presented three common ICD-10 misconceptions, and what the firm considers to be the truth opposing each.
McKesson's myths, presented during a Webinar last week, overlap with ICD10Watch's own Top 5 ICD-10 myths debunked, quite naturally, though not entirely. So it's worth breaking them out for readers: (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4065449</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:23:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4065449</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why 2011 is the year to build hardware into your ICD-10 budget</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4036765&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fwhy-2011-year-build-hardware-your-icd-10-budget</link>
            <description>Allocating resources, financial and otherwise, for ICD-10 is certain to be a complex, multi-layered and ongoing achievement. The range of software applications and personnel has garnered much attention thus far, but hardware will cost healthcare organizations, too &amp;ndash; and that's not just servers. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4036765</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:30:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4036765</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>CAC's tide rising with ICD-10</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4018249&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fcacs-tide-rising-icd-10</link>
            <description>Plenty of folks said this would be coming and now it has begun &amp;ndash; computer-assisted coding tools started rolling toward ICD-10 in the form of one acquisition, a trio of partnerships, and a new tool. Hardly the first such CAC wares to support ICD-10 but, taken together, they represent a collective wave of what's to come. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4018249</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:57:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4018249</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Milestone for Vocabulary Resources</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4013299&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fmilestone-vocabulary-resources</link>
            <description>The Vocabulary Task Force of the HIT Standards Committee is hard at work specifying the vocabularies and codesets that should be publicly available to accelerate certification and meaningful use efforts. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4013299</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:42:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4013299</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What the ICD-9 and ICD-10 code freeze means to you</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3994065&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fwhat-icd-9-and-icd-10-code-freeze-means-you</link>
            <description>The ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee has confirmed that ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes will be frozen - but there's both good and bad news about that for provider and payers. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3994065</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:26:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3994065</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why ICD-10 ought to be part of the ONC's EHR best practices list</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3972982&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fwhy-icd-10-ought-be-part-oncs-ehr-best-practices-list</link>
            <description>When selecting and planning implementation of an EHR (Electronic Health Records) system, healthcare organizations of all sizes have much to consider &amp;ndash; just don't overlook HIPAA 5010 or ICD-10 from the onset. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3972982</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:21:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3972982</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why ICD-10 ought to part of the ONC's EHR best practices list</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3965526&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fwhy-icd-10-ought-part-oncs-ehr-best-practices-list</link>
            <description>When selecting and planning implementation of an EHR (Electronic Health Records) system, healthcare organizations of all sizes have much to consider &amp;ndash; just don't overlook HIPAA 5010 or ICD-10 from the onset. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3965526</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:21:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3965526</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD-10 on wrong side of medical-loss ratio in NAIC's draft proposal?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3929309&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Ficd-10-wrong-side-medical-loss-ratio-naics-draft-proposal</link>
            <description>ICD-10 looks a bit beleaguered this week. That's after state insurance commissioners issued a proposal under which health insurers would not be permitted to consider ICD-10 within their medical-loss ratio (MLR) &amp;ndash; and physician and hospital organizations backed the idea. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3929309</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:17:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3929309</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Q&amp;A: ICD-10 worst case scenario</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3957965&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Ficd10-qa</link>
            <description>Y2K threatened power outages, food and water shortages, bank failures &amp;ndash; all of which would render folks around the globe cold, hungry, thirsty, and without any way to get money to quell those. That catastrophe never happened, but ICD-10 has since been compared to Y2K, warranted or not. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3957965</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:02:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3957965</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>McKinsey: ICD-10 among regs requiring payers to rework 90 percent of IT architectures</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3880952&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fmckinsey-icd-10-among-regs-requiring-payers-rework-90-percent-it-architectures</link>
            <description>Here's a prophecy guaranteed to make healthcare CIOs and their staffs wake up in a midsummer night's cold-sweat: a triptych of regulations, when taken together, will require payers to transform almost all IT systems and architecture. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3880952</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:56:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3880952</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What UK ICD-10 Use Can Teach the US ICD-10 Implementations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3876750&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2010%2F08%2F11%2Fwhat-uk-icd-10-use-can-teach-the-us-icd-10-implementations%2F</link>
            <description>I guess kind of like they just had Shark Week on TV, this week on EMR and HIPAA has been ICD-10 week.  So far I&amp;#8217;ve covered EMR vendors ICD-10 planning, moving to ICD-10 and bridging from ICD-9 to ICD-10.
In response to my previous ICD-10 posts, Gordon Fenton provided this interesting insight about the UK&amp;#8217;s experience with ICD-10.
Over in the UK we already use the ICD10 along side the OPCS code to generate our HRG&amp;#8217;s which is the currenvy that commissioners and providers use in the billing process.
While I am based on the commissioner side I know that our providers employ coders whose specific job is to translate Doctors notes into ICD and OPCS codes.
The main challenge will be in varifying and validating the codes being applied by providers, the IT is just a small issue. I...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3876750</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:04:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3876750</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An EMR Vendor’s Approach to Bridging from ICD-9 to ICD-10</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3876754&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2010%2F08%2F06%2Fan-emr-vendors-approach-to-bridging-from-icd-9-to-icd-10%2F</link>
            <description>This report will show the available ICD-10 codes. The doctor can study it, start to change, or ignore it.
3. The staff can opt to let the software map one ICD-10 to the ICD-9 or manually enter the code of their choice.
4. Our electronic claims software will have a flag per insurance carrier indicating whether or not it will accept ICD-10. For those that will, we will map the ICD-9 to the 10 and send that code. If no map identified, we will generate an error edit.
5. At some point down the road, we will use the information collected from billing to update the doctor&amp;#8217;s preferred list of dx codes in the EMR.
6. We will have to augment customized programs at each client site that may be doing reports based on ICD-9.


Related posts:A Look at Moving to ICD-10 The push to ICD-10 is rapidly...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3876754</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:37:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3876754</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Three more understated aspects of ICD-10, part two</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3831431&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fthree-more-understated-aspects-icd-10-part-two</link>
            <description>ICD-10 is a multi-headed beast. As such, there are many faces to the new code sets; some are well known while others, often just as important, are not so understood.
In our first installment, ICD10Watch reported the facets that readers likely do not, but really ought to, know more about. That triptych has since proven to be something of a beginning.
And so the list of understated ICD-10 aspects continues: (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3831431</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:54:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3831431</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Look at Moving to ICD-10</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3827147&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2010%2F08%2F04%2Fa-look-at-moving-to-icd-10%2F</link>
            <description>The push to ICD-10 is rapidly approaching. That&amp;#8217;s why I was interested to know how EMR vendors were going to get the ICD-10 code list. However, there are going to be a lot of other nuances for EMR vendors to move from ICD-9 to ICD-10.
The following is a short description of some real data around the move from ICD-9 to ICD-10. It&amp;#8217;s from a newsletter sent out by ArcSys including some interesting data from a real clinic. It&amp;#8217;s going to be interesting to make the transition to ICD-10 along with all the fun things happening around Meaningful Use.
On October 1, 2013, all claims processing needs to be transitioned to the new ICD-10. As you can well anticipate, this will be a major change for the healthcare industry. As a practice, your biggest challenge will be the re-education o...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3827147</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:20:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3827147</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Are EMR Vendors Planning for ICD-10?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3808732&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2010%2F07%2F29%2Fwhat-are-emr-vendors-planning-for-icd-10%2F</link>
            <description>I remember when I first started my job at a healthcare facility 5+ years ago, I ran into these codes they called ICD-9. Yes, this was all very foreign to me, but I learned quickly the meaning of ICD-9. I also learned quickly that the EMR vendor which had been selected (before I was there) didn&amp;#8217;t provide a list of ICD-9 as part of their EMR software (they do now). They did provide an upload feature and so we exported a list out of our old PMS, cleaned them up a little and then uploaded them into the new EMR. Not a fun or effective process even that way.
Obviously, we&amp;#8217;ve come a long way in five years. There are plenty of free lists of ICD-9 codes around the net that people can use, manipulate and add to their EMR software pretty easily.
However, I couldn&amp;#8217;t help but wonder w...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3808732</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:35:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3808732</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD-10 absent from latest health IT priorities report</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3802475&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Ficd-10-absent-latest-health-it-priorities-report</link>
            <description>Perhaps it's waiting on the back burner but ICD-10 did not make the cut of health IT's most important projects for 2010 and 2011, at least not among healthcare executives.
That little fact emerged during a study conducted by CSC, which found that &amp;ldquo;neither IT nor operational executives placed a high priority on converting to ICD-10,&amp;rdquo; Diana Manos of Healthcare IT News reports in Meaningful Use top priority for healthcare executives. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3802475</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:41:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3802475</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top 3 understated aspects of ICD-10</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3750129&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Ftop-3-understated-aspects-icd-10</link>
            <description>To many healthcare IT professionals the phrase ICD-10 is downright frightening. Mammoth in expanse and expense, the conversion, along with the requisite HIPAA 5010, is the stuff of Jungian nightmares, early retirement, or profound career changes. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3750129</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3750129</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Man Is Not Equal To The Sum Of His Medicine Problems</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3665970&amp;cid=t_201015_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fa-man-is-not-equal-to-the-sum-of-his-medical-problems%2F2010.06.16</link>
            <description>I believe that those controlling the purse strings are steering modern medicine towards the practice of seeing patients more as the sum of their medical problems than as individual people. Patients have become streams of data as opposed to real human lives. 

Consider the dynamics of a family: a wife may worry about her husband while their child adores a father she instinctively knows to be irreplaceable. Modern medicine, however, may only see a diabetic with hypertension and a cholesterol-level running too high. The computers programmed for those advocating the power of data to revolutionize medicine would boil this man down to his “meaningful” essence….numbers, for the above imaginary man: 250.00, 401.0, and 272.0. (more&amp;#8230;) (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3665970</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:00:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3665970</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Garbage In, Garbage Out</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3522658&amp;cid=t_201015_105_f&amp;fid=38964&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdrwes.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fgarbage-in-garbage-out.html</link>
            <description>The question came up at a recent meeting:“How many atrial fibrillation ablations did I perform last year?”It was a seemingly simple request. One that our vast array of computer technology and Electronic Medical Record should be able to conquer in a few microseconds. So after an administrator talked to the responsible Information Technology officer and they searched and scanned the appropriate clinical and billing files, a day later came the answer:Exactly one.My swollen legs can attest to the inaccuracy of this result. Yet with the speed of the hospital intranet, the results were broadcast as gospel in an e-mail to those who needed to know. Decisions were being made. Projections for upcoming years decided.Which lead me to ponder the obvious.How helpful will our electronic medical recor...</description>
            <author>Dr. Wes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3522658</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 12:21:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3522658</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD 10 And Meaningful Use Lack Incentives for Doctors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3460250&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2010%2F03%2F31%2Ficd-10-and-meaningful-use-lack-incentives-for-doctors%2F</link>
            <description>One of the really interesting conversations I had recently was with Tori Sullivan from Capgemini. Tori is knee deep in the fun that is ICD 10 and the transition to ICD 10. However, one thing that she said really struck a major chord with me during our discussion. She said&amp;#8230;
&amp;#8220;ICD 10 and Meaningful Use Don&amp;#8217;t Focus Enough Incentives for Doctors.&amp;#8221;
Basically, what&amp;#8217;s the benefits for doctors to implement these regulations and changes? If you&amp;#8217;ve ready me for any length of time, you probably have realized that I&amp;#8217;m a doctor&amp;#8217;s advocate. I strongly believe that some of the major reasons that EMR software hasn&amp;#8217;t been adopted more widely is because far too many of the EMR software don&amp;#8217;t put enough focus on the doctor.
Like it or not, Doctors ar...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3460250</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:13:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3460250</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Podcast: HIMSS CEO Steve Lieber, 2010 edition</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3298411&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fpodcast-himss-ceo-steve-lieber-2010.html</link>
            <description>Last Thursday, for the fourth consecutive year, I sat down with HIMSS CEO H. Stephen Lieber for an interview ahead of the opening of the annual HIMSS conference. For the third consecutive year, the recording actually worked. And for the second consecutive year, I went to HIMSS headquarters in downtown Chicago for the interview, rather than waiting for the conference itself. Unfortunately, the HVAC system in the conference room was rather noisy, so there is some background noise. Still, the voices come through loud and clear.I wrote a story based on this interview in Monday's FierceHealthIT, but here is the world premiere of the full recording.Podcast details: Interview with HIMSS CEO H. Stephen Lieber on the 2010 HIMSS conference, recorded  Feb. 18, 2010. MP3, stereo, 128 kbps, 31.7 MB, ru...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3298411</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:01:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3298411</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>If Lawyers Billed Like Doctors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2862512&amp;cid=t_201015_105_f&amp;fid=38964&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdrwes.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F10%2Fif-lawyers-billed-like-doctors-billed.html</link>
            <description>Imagine if lawyers had to bill like doctors:Beginning July 1, 2010, under the Legal Billing Obfuscation Act of 2009, lawyers will receive their payments for services rendered after approval by a central US government Payment Distribution Authority (USPDA). To receive payment from the Authority plaintiff and defendant complaints must be coded and filed electronically using the International Classification of Legal Complaints, 10th edition (ICLD-10), copyright © 2009, American Bar Association and Legal Proceeding Terminology (LPT) codes, copyright © 2009 American Bar Association. The full publication of each of these codes will be available in print March 1st 2010 and in electronic form on DVD in July 2011. To familiarize lawyers with the new coding scheme requested by the USPDA, a small s...</description>
            <author>Dr. Wes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2862512</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:07:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2862512</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD-10 Implementation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2667553&amp;cid=t_201015_122_f&amp;fid=34755&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneuropsychological.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Ficd-10-implementation.html</link>
            <description>Lisa Eramo has written a piece for HealthLeaders Media about ICD-10 implementation issues and timelines. The article is available online: Providers May Need Four Years to Implement ICD-10.[snippet]&quot;Industry experts have repeatedly said that ICD-10 implementation must begin immediately in order for hospitals, health plans, and vendors to meet the October 1, 2013 compliance deadline. But now there is detailed evidence to prove it.&quot;[snippet] (Source: BrainBlog)</description>
            <author>BrainBlog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2667553</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:10:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2667553</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IT staffing issues</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2598322&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fit-staffing-issues.html</link>
            <description>The newly published July issue of Hospitals &amp; Health Networks includes a story I wrote about the worsening staffing crunch in health IT.Between the rush to install EMRs by January 2011, tighter HIPAA privacy and security requirements and the transition to ICD-10 coding and ANSI X12 5010 transactions, it could be a tough next few years for IT departments. But you probably already knew that. (Source: Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog)</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2598322</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:53:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2598322</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will ICD-10 Solve Interoperability Problems?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2353921&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2F08nCQqKnxoE%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve been hearing a bit of discussion about ICD-10 really helping to solve some of the problems of interoperability. Their contention is basically that ICD-10 is more precise in its description of the diagnosis and so therefore the information that is coded using ICD-10 will then provide more specific codified information that can then be rather easily shared. If you haven&amp;#8217;t read about the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, here&amp;#8217;s a good article about the transition.
In theory, this is completely accurate. If everything went as outlined, we could really get a lot of interesting information for studies and for interoperability of health data out of our ICD-10 codes.
The problem is that in reality ICD-10 is just going to cause even more problems for sharing quality data. Not ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2353921</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:55:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2353921</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD-10 Code Sets Pushed by 2 Years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2108645&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D534</link>
            <description>Remember that whole blog I had the other day about how the government should lead by example? Well today they pushed the implementation of ICD-10 codes by 2 years. See, I feel like no one takes any regulation in health care seriously because every time they release a regulation, it always ends up getting pushed a couple of years.
If you&amp;#8217;d like to read more about it, head on over to HHS Issues Final ICD-10 Code Sets and Updated Electronic Transaction Standards Rules.
My favorite quote was:
“These regulations will move the nation toward a more efficient, quality-focused health care system by helping accelerate the widespread adoption of health information technology,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said.  “The greatly expanded ICD-10 code sets will fully support quality reporting, p...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2108645</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:09:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2108645</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD 10 revisited</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1768915&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34933&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpalmdoc.net%2F%3Fp%3D1745</link>
            <description>Kevin MD says Get Ready For ICD 10 in 2011. This prompts me to update my previous post on ICD 10 codes for your PDA/Smartphone. 
In summary here they are again, with some new additions. Use with the reader of your choice.
Freeware options:
Databases:
PilotDB and MobileDB versions
Handbase version
Excel version (New! - courtesy of Palmdoc.net )
Text lists:
Word/Text format
TealDoc format
iSilo format
Web based:
Online version from the WHO: bookmark this link in your PDA&amp;#8217;s browser! 
I checked out how the WHO&amp;#8217;s ICD 10 Online site looks in Blazer. I was initially concerned as it is a framed page but it renders OK in Blazer and the search and results display decently on the little screen. I am a believer in the Future is Online and that &amp;#8220;cloud computing&amp;#8221; will be a major ...</description>
            <author>The Palmdoc Chronicles</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1768915</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1768915</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Privacy, please</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1717065&amp;cid=t_201015_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F08%2Fprivacy-please.html</link>
            <description>A weekend trip to Maine for a family wedding turned into a business trip (and a tax deduction) when I was reminded that the 16th National HIPAA Summit and related Privacy Symposium were taking place at Harvard University this week. Since I was flying in and out of Boston, I hesitantly forked over the $150 extortion—er, change—fee to American Airlines and sprung for a hotel room, mostly so I could attend a heated debate—er, “roundtable discussion” (even though the table was not round)—about whether patient privacy rules were effective.I’m pretty sure it was worth the money. Boston usually is. While in the area, I also got a tour of athenahealth’s Watertown headquarters. I learned that “chief athenista” and new daddy Todd Park is on paternity leave for the next several mo...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1717065</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1717065</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

