<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: ideals</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'ideals'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22ideals%22&t=%22ideals%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:58:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Body Image: Is &quot;Fat Talk Free&quot; Really the Best Policy?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4082040&amp;cid=t_337263_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Ffeel%2Fbody-image-is-fat-talk-free-really-the-best-policy%2F</link>
            <description>If you&amp;#8217;re not a college student, you might not know about &amp;#8220;Fat Talk Free Week&amp;#8221;, a campaign to boost body image that started today on at least 35 college campuses. The campaign, put on by a  sponsored by Tri Delta sororities with several campus and corporate partners, is designed to teach young women to feel good about their bodies, stop using &amp;#8220;fat talk&amp;#8221;, and prevent eating disorders.
So what qualifies as fat talk, and why is it so important to leave it out of your lexicon? According to the Fat Talk Free Facebook page:
Examples of fat talk include: “I’m so fat,” “Do I look fat in this?” “I need to lose 10 pounds” and “She’s too fat to be wearing that swimsuit.” Statements that are considered fat talk don’t necessarily have to be negative;...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4082040</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:06:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4082040</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Memorial Day, 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3614569&amp;cid=t_337263_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F05%2F31%2Fmemorial-day-2010%2F</link>
            <description>Another Memorial Day here in the U.S., and another year that we commemorate and remember those who&amp;#8217;ve given their lives for our freedom and our nation. 
Those who have died did so that, in the future, our country might be safer. They died so that great evils could be done away with in WWII (and WWI). They died so that politicians could wage endless, unwinnable wars for political ideals (Vietnam, Korea, and now Iraq). They died, quite simply, so that we could enjoy the freedoms we so often take for granted in our country.
I am grateful for the country I live in and for the sacrifices others have made to not only attain its freedom, but to keep it. Today, we remember their lives. 
For every veteran and every active duty soldier and individual in military uniform &amp;#8212; thank you. Than...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3614569</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 13:08:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3614569</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can we bank on trust?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2442750&amp;cid=t_337263_150_f&amp;fid=36939&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fscientific-misconduct.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F05%2Fcan-we-bank-on-trust.html</link>
            <description>In a feature today &quot;Can We Bank on Objectivity&quot; Patti Tereskerz looks at the rules proposed by the National Institutes of Health for dealing with financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research.While agreeing with the article in large part, it starts from a somewhat misguided position. Take a read and see what you think. It begins:&quot;Trust is the crown jewel of the research enterprise. Financial arrangements related to research that call into question the integrity of investigators or research institutions are damaging, not only because they may potentially harm research participants, but because they are associated with the appearance of impropriety. Either way, trust is compromised.&quot;This misunderstands the nature of science. Science is, at its core, based not trust, but on it's very...</description>
            <author>Scientific Misconduct Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2442750</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2442750</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Memorial Day, 2009</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2441694&amp;cid=t_337263_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F05%2F25%2Fmemorial-day-2009%2F</link>
            <description>This Memorial Day in the U.S. &amp;#8212; like every Memorial Day &amp;#8212; we commemorate and remember those who&amp;#8217;ve given their lives for our freedoms and our nation. &amp;#8220;Given their lives&amp;#8221; is really not accurate, though, as Andy Rooney noted &amp;#8212; these soldiers died, plain and simple. They died so that in the future, our country might be safer or democracy might be nurtured in an otherwise hostile environment. They died so that great evils could be done away with in WWII (and WWI). They died so that politicians could wage endless, unwinnable wars for political ideals (Vietnam, Korea, and now Iraq). They died, quite simply, so that we could enjoy the freedoms we so often take for granted in our country.
I hope, like most people, that in the future war become less of an option ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2441694</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:08:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2441694</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

