<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: intake</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'intake'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22intake%22&t=%22intake%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:02:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>The Right To Bear Salt: Is Sodium Restriction Warranted For The General Population?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4934163&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fthe-right-to-bear-salt-is-sodium-restriction-warranted-for-the-general-population%2F2011.06.15</link>
            <description>Q. What is the difference between a public health expert and Il Duce?
A. Mussolini was not nearly as arrogant as a public health expert.
In prior posts, DrRich related how two major publc health efforts over the past few decades – the effort to put all of us on low-fat diets, and the effort to reduce everyone’s cholesterol levels – have amounted to massive experiments, based upon insufficiently-tested assumptions and surmises and hypotheses which the experts arrogantly (and incorrectly) determined to be fact, and which were conducted upon the entire American population without its knowledge or consent.
These public health experiments cost billions of dollars, needlessly transformed large swatches of American industry, and (at least in the case of low-fat diets) likely produced signif...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4934163</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:00:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4934163</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Book Review: “Why We Get Fat: And What To Do About It”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4429021&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fbook-review-why-we-get-fat-and-what-to-do-about-it%2F2011.02.02</link>
            <description>Journalist Gary Taubes created a stir in 2007 with his impressive but daunting 640-page tome Good Calories, Bad Calories. Now he has written a shorter, more accessible book Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It to take his message to a wider audience. His basic thesis is that:
- The calories-in/calories-out model is wrong.
- Carbohydrates are the cause of obesity and are also important causes of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s, and most of the so-called diseases of civilization.
- A low-fat diet is not healthy.
- A low-carb diet is essential both for weight loss and for health.
- Dieters can satisfy their hunger pangs and eat as much as they want and still lose weight as long as they restrict carbohydrates.
He supports his thesis with data from the scientific litera...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4429021</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:00:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4429021</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Know Thy Calories: Nutrition Labeling Guidelines For Restaurants</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4337942&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fknow-thy-calories-nutrition-labeling-guidelines-for-restaurants%2F2011.01.11</link>
            <description>As part of the new healthcare legislation (Affordable Care Act), the FDA has now published its guidelines for restaurants to inform consumers of the calorie counts of food. It establishes requirements for nutrition labeling of standard menu items for chain restaurants and chain vending machine operators.
This is important because Americans now consume an estimated one-third of their total calories from foods prepared outside the home. Consumers are generally unaware of the number of calories they consume from these foods, and being overweight or obese increases the risk of a number of diseases including heart disease, type 2 diabetes, stroke, and cancer.
Here&amp;#8217;s what the guidelines say:
&amp;#8211; Restaurants with 20 or more locations must disclose the number of calories in each stand...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4337942</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4337942</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Calories in Disguise</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4298670&amp;cid=t_121657_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F12%2F29%2Fcalories-in-disguise%2F</link>
            <description>Low-carb proponents claim that eating a low-carb diet enhances weight loss irrespective of caloric content.  Low-fat proponents often make the same claim.  Many other advocates of special diets make similar claims: It’s not calories, it’s something else causing weight loss.
In support of their diet&amp;#8217;s efficacy, proponents often cite their own successes or the success of other followers. However, they often fail to acknowledge that many other people lose weight following radically different weight-loss plans.  And never mind the scientific research, as it provides evidence that all successful weight loss programs share a common characteristic: create a calorie deficit on a consistent basis and weight loss follows.

Calorie Defined
A calorie is a unit of energy. It is the amount ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4298670</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:20:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4298670</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Myth Behind Drinking 8 Glasses of Water a Day</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4241767&amp;cid=t_121657_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F12%2F08%2Fthe-myth-behind-drinking-8-glasses-of-water-a-day%2F</link>
            <description>It&amp;#8217;s common knowledge that we should drink at least eight glasses of water a day. Or at least many people think it’s common knowledge.
Heinz Valtin, a Dartmouth Medical School physician, disagrees.
In an invited review published by the American Journal of Physiology, Valtin reported that there is no supporting evidence to back up the popular recommendation to drink eight 8 oz. glasses of water per day.
How did the 8 X 8 myth start? Valtin thinks that the notion may have started in 1945 when the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council recommended approximately “1 milliliter of water for each calorie of food,” which would amount to roughly 2 to 2.5 quarts per day (64 to 80 ounces).
In its next sentence the board stated, “[M]ost of this quantity is contained in...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4241767</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:20:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4241767</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Picture Your Diet” With PhotoCalorie</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4179319&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fpicture-your-diet-with-photocalorie%2F2010.11.18</link>
            <description>Although I can check the calorie content of any food on WolframAlpha, it’s good to have a site that focuses only on this issue:
PhotoCalorie is an application inspired by the ideas of Dr. Mark Boguski of Harvard Medical School, who realized that the current methods available to track your daily nutrient intake are monotonous and simply too complicated.  As a result, people would lose interest in tracking their diet or stop the diet all together. Our mission is to create the easiest food journal on the planet to help dieters lose weight and monitor their diet with ease.



			
			*This blog post was originally published at ScienceRoll* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4179319</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:00:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4179319</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Aspartame: Facts Vs. Fiction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4018177&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Faspartame-facts-vs-fiction%2F2010.09.30</link>
            <description>If you believe everything you read on the Internet, then is seems that a chemical found in thousands of products is causing an epidemic of severe neurological and systemic diseases, like multiple sclerosis and lupus. The FDA, the companies that make the product, and the “medical industrial complex” all know about the dangers of this chemical, but are hiding the truth from the public in order to protect corporate profits and avoid the pesky paper work that would accompany the truth being revealed.
The only glimmer of hope is a dedicated band of bloggers and anonymous email chain letter authors who aren’t afraid to speak the truth. Armed with the latest anecdotal evidence, unverified speculation, and scientifically implausible claims, they have been tirelessly ranting about the evils o...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4018177</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:00:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4018177</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Skin Pigmentation – Genetics, the Sun &amp; Aging</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3545642&amp;cid=t_121657_160_f&amp;fid=36189&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skinmdblog.com%2F74%2Fskin-pigmentation-genetics-the-sun-aging%2F</link>
            <description>Skin pigmentation is caused by the hormone melanin.  It is produced by specialized cells called melanocytes located in the deepest of the skin’s layers.
Your genes are partially responsible for the amount of melanin present in your skin’s cells.  Other than that, sun exposure is the primary cause of increased melanin production.
There are some medical conditions (mostly hormonal changes) that will cause increased melanin production.  Sometimes the melanin clumps or forms patches.  The appearance of clumps or patches can be distressing.  They are sometimes referred to as age spots.
Although getting older may play a role, everyone wants to live a long life.  So, inevitably everyone will get older.
What many people hope to do is to minimize the damage that time does to their faces a...</description>
            <author>Skin MD</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3545642</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 12:40:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3545642</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>American Obesity And Sugar-Sweetened Beverages</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3524113&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Famerican-obesity-and-sugar-sweetened-beverages%2F2010.05.01</link>
            <description>We are a nation stricken with an epidemic of obesity, which contributes to the incidence of diabetes and heart disease. Each of these has been linked to consumption of sugar intake, and in particular, sugar-sweetened beverages.
There&amp;#8217;s nothing evil about sugar &amp;#8212; it&amp;#8217;s just that too much of it in certain forms is bad for you. For the purpose of definition, sugar-sweetened beverages contain added, naturally-derived caloric sweeteners such as sucrose (table sugar), high-fructose corn syrup, or fruit juice concentrates. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			This post, American Obesity And Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, was originally published on
			Healthine.com by Paul S Auerbach M.D., M.S.. (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3524113</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 22:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3524113</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Healthy Nutrition Through Behavior Modification</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3522674&amp;cid=t_121657_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F05%2F01%2Fhealthy-nutrition-through-behavior-modification%2F</link>
            <description>For the past two years I have been attempting to manage my weight through behavior modification, healthy eating and exercise. After losing 190 pounds with diet and exercise, I can assume that I am very capable of making healthy choices; however, this past weekend illustrated how emotions can contribute to slipups in the healthy lifestyle department. I am as human as anyone else and I ended my week with a weight gain. Through each painful experience I have learned much about managing my emotions. Finding my inner balance may always be a struggle for me and many of you as well. The important factor in finding my inner balance is to modify my behavior through discipline and goal setting.
The negative factor in my equation of healthy lifestyle choices are unforeseen events, which by their very...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3522674</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 13:15:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3522674</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Caffeine Eases Exercise-Induced Muscle Pain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2306911&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blisstree.com%2Fhealthbolt%2Fcaffeine-eases-exercise-induced-muscle-pain%2F</link>
            <description>Great news for all the caffeine addicts out there. It&amp;#8217;s a known fact that caffeine is a performance enhancer, one of the very few that isn&amp;#8217;t banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

But now a new study by University of Illinois researchers has found that caffeine eases the muscle pains of exercising.
The study involved 25 fit, college-aged men. Some of the participants were regular caffeine users, ie ones who drank at least four cups of coffee (or the equivalent in caffeine laced drinks) a day on average, while others either didn&amp;#8217;t take in caffeine at all or only had a small daily intake.
After an initial exercise test on an exercise bike to determine maximal oxygen consumption, the participants were then monitored while doing two high-intensity, half-hour exercise sessio...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2306911</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:52:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2306911</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hearing Voices or Seeing Things? Cut Back on the Coffee</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2110603&amp;cid=t_121657_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F01%2F16%2Fhearing-voices-or-seeing-things-cut-back-on-the-coffee%2F</link>
            <description>As we reported yesterday, people with a higher caffeine intake, from sources such as coffee, tea and caffeinated energy drinks, are more likely to report hallucinatory experiences such as hearing voices and seeing things that are not there.
	
When under stress, the body releases a stress hormone called cortisol. More of this stress hormone is released in response to stress when people have recently had caffeine. It is this extra boost of cortisol which may link caffeine intake with an increased tendency to hallucinate, said the researchers.

	This isn&amp;#8217;t likely a concern for most people, as most people don&amp;#8217;t consume 7 or more cups of coffee every day. (And if you do, you might have more problems than simply hearing the occasional odd voice or whatnot.) 
	But it has a direct impa...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2110603</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:59:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2110603</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Did You Eat Your Fruits and Vegetables Today?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1626037&amp;cid=t_121657_107_f&amp;fid=36585&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FHighlightHEALTH%2F%7E3%2F336132424%2F</link>
            <description>This study therefore suggest that social approval bias might well be a substantial problem in the interpretation of nutritional intervention effects that are dependent on education and awareness to affect behavior change. The magnitude of this bias is similar to the intervention effects reported in many studies evaluating changes in fruit and vegetable intake (ranging from 0.93 to 1.25 servings per day). Thus, a major challenge facing nutritional intervention researchers is assessing true behavioral change based on self-reports from reporting bias.

This doesn&amp;#8217;t mean that health questionnaires are useless. Rather, it means that many people simply aren&amp;#8217;t being entirely truthful when it comes to how many fruits and vegetables they eat. The authors suggest that, in large dietary i...</description>
            <author>Highlight HEALTH</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1626037</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:30:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1626037</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Water: A scambuster report</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1544106&amp;cid=t_121657_117_f&amp;fid=36026&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fzimney%2Fwater-a-scambuster-report%2F</link>
            <description>That’s right, even water can be a scam these days. That’s because of relentless marketing, widespread misinformation and an ingrained mythology surrounding what ought to be a pretty simple fact of modern life: If you’re thirsty, have a glass of tap water. That would stand in contradistinction to a claim such as, “You need to drink at least eight eight ounce glasses of water a day (the 8&amp;#215;8 rule), preferably bottled, regardless of whether you’re thirsty and regardless of whether you live in a hot climate or engage in strenuous physical activity.” In fact, the 8&amp;#215;8 rule is so thoroughly entrenched in our common psyche that even most healthcare practitioners and nutritionists will spout it without a moment’s hesitation.
Unfortunately, however, the 8&amp;#215;8 rule is a comp...</description>
            <author>Dr. Z's Medical Report</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1544106</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:32:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1544106</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Smoking, Alcohol, Caffeine and Ovarian Cancer Risk</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1184760&amp;cid=t_121657_136_f&amp;fid=36051&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FCancerCommentary%2F%7E3%2F224881823%2F</link>
            <description>Last week, came out interesting new findings on ovarian cancer.
New developments revealed that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption do not have an effect on ovarian cancer risk.
However, caffeine intake may lower the risk of developing ovarian cancer, particularly in women not using hormones.
Such were the findings published in the March 1, 2008 issue of CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.
There was no association between current or past smoking and ovarian cancer risk, however smoking status, duration, and pack-years were significantly associated with risk of mucinous tumors, a rare form of ovarian cancer. The authors also found no association between alcohol consumption and ovarian cancer risk.
However they observed an inverse trend of risk with total caf...</description>
            <author>Cancer Commentary</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1184760</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1184760</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Calcium Increases Ones Chance Of A Heart Attack???</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1161152&amp;cid=t_121657_111_f&amp;fid=36048&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAHeartyLife%2F%7E3%2F219027354%2F</link>
            <description>You say po-tae-to I say po-ta-to. Calcium supplements are now under fire. For years it has been thought that prescribing calcium to post menopausal women helped maintain bone health as well as possibly reducing the risk of high cholesterol. Apparently that news is &amp;#8217;so yesterday&amp;#8217;.
Researchers at the University of Auckland examined the effects of calcium supplementation on heart attacks stroke and sudden death. 1,471 healthy post-menopausal women aged 55 years or over took part in the study. And just what did they find?
Dietary calcium intake was assessed and women were seen every six months over five years. Adverse events were recorded at each visit. Heart attacks were more commonly reported in the calcium group. The occurrence of any three vascular events (heart attack, stroke ...</description>
            <author>A Hearty Life</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1161152</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:34:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1161152</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Combined Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Moderate Alcohol Intake Can Lower Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1149800&amp;cid=t_121657_85_f&amp;fid=36195&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealth.tesstermulo.com%2F%3Fp%3D416</link>
            <description>In previous separate studies, we learned that having more physical activity and drinking alcoholic beverages moderately can have favorable effects on cardiovascular health. But so far, there hasn&amp;#8217;t been a study that analyzed the combined effects of the two factors in the risk of ischemic heart disease and all-cause mortality.
In a study published in European Heart Journal last January 9, 2008, a team of Danish researchers took a look at the combined effects of staying active via physical activities and of drinking alcoholic beverages. The data used in the study were part of the Copenhagen City Heart study, which involved 11,914 Danish men and women aged 20 years and older without cardiovascular disease. Participants accomplished questionnaire regarding alcohol intake and physical act...</description>
            <author>Prudence, M.D.</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1149800</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:35:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1149800</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Smoking Increases Risk Of Diabetes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1090590&amp;cid=t_121657_134_f&amp;fid=36049&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FDiabetesNotes%2F%7E3%2F199481945%2F</link>
            <description>Ok, so I have to admit that when I first started reading about this little tidbit of research I repeated aloud over and over and over again, &amp;#8220;are you kidding?&amp;#8221; My husband actually asked me &amp;#8220;how many times are you going to say that?&amp;#8221; My response&amp;#8230; &amp;#8220;seriously, are they kidding on this one?&amp;#8221;
Smoking is now being linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. It was a no brainer for me when I started to think it out. Smoking equals increased heart disease equals increased risk for diabetes. But was I right on?
&amp;#8220;Conversely, there are also possible non-causal explanations for this association. Smoking is often associated with other unhealthy behaviors that favor weight gain and/or diabetes, such as lack of physical activity, poor fruit and vegetabl...</description>
            <author>Diabetes Notes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1090590</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:55:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1090590</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA to Consider Tightening Regulations and Labeling for Salt in Food</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=970106&amp;cid=t_121657_97_f&amp;fid=35050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmaGazette%2F%7E3%2F173402969%2Ffda_to_consider_tightening_reg.html</link>
            <description>November 29, 2007 the U.S Food and Drug Administration meeting will consider a request for the agency to strengthen regulations and labeling for salt.The Center for Science in the Public Interest has asked the FDA to consider regulating the amount of salt that is put into processed foods and to require additional health information on the labels of food containing salt.Reducing or eliminating salt intake is one of the suggested way to help reduce high blood pressure, a condition suffered by one in three Americans, so being able to correctly tell that sodium content of food is paramount. Forcing limits on salt content would also help in controlling something that has become a national epidemic.If you&amp;#39;ve never tried to shop for someone that needs to control their salt intake, you should ...</description>
            <author>PharmaGazette</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=970106</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:30:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">970106</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On the hunt for vitamin D</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=760471&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=34865&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecancerblog.com%2F2007%2F07%2F26%2Fon-the-hunt-for-vitamin-d%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Breast Cancer, Diets, Vitamins and nutrientsVitamin D is one of the latest, greatest hot cancer topics. Why? Well, it seems many of us women are vitamin D deficient. Such a deficiency might be linked to breast cancer risk so it's in our best interest to make sure we get a healthy dose of this vitamin. It's not as easy as adhering to the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) guidelines, though. Follow them and you'll still come up short -- the Food and Nutrition Board, responsible for setting the DRIs, have not yet updated guidelines in light of cancer concerns. So what's a girl to do? For starters, we need to understand that for overall health benefits, 1,000 IU (International Units) per day are necessary. The outdated DRI recommends 200 to 600 IU. This is based on preventing only bo...</description>
            <author>The Cancer Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=760471</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">760471</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Colorectal cancer risk and fiber intake</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=644933&amp;cid=t_121657_87_f&amp;fid=34865&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecancerblog.com%2F2007%2F05%2F30%2Fcolorectal-cancer-risk-and-fiber-intake%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Colon and Rectal Cancer, Diets, Cancer prevention foodsEven though there has been much hype in recent years about the connection between dietary fiber intake to decrease the risk of colorectal cancer, results of a large study does not support such a link.
The findings were reported in the May issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. The conclusion came after analyzing more that 291,000 men and 197,000 women ages 50 to 71 years. &quot;Our study did not show any association between how much dietary fiber you eat and your risk of colorectal cancer&quot; said the lead author of the study.
However, the lead author did say that he found consumption of whole grain foods may lower the risk of developing the disease.
 
 Read&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;Permalink&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;Email this&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;Li...</description>
            <author>The Cancer Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=644933</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">644933</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

