<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: intellectual disability</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'intellectual disability'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22intellectual+disability%22&t=%22intellectual+disability%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:53:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Research Briefs 4-10-10:  Working memory, executive functioning and ID/MR</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3457906&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F04%2Freearch-briefs-4-10-10-working-memory.html</link>
            <description>The cognitive neuroscience constructs of working memory and executive function (EF) are hot topics in all areas of cognition.&amp;nbsp; Although working memory measures are now showing up on most contemporary IQ tests, the measurement of executive functioning (EF) is not...and is typically measured by special purpose tests, tests that all suffer from a solid empirical foundation of research that clearly specifies the elements of, relations between, operational definitions of, etc. the components of EF.I was thus excited to see the table of contents for the recent issue of the Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (see below), as it focuses primarily on working memory and EF research for people with ID/MR.&amp;nbsp; My excitement was short-lived as I found that, at least at my Universities li...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3457906</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:10:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3457906</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Psychometric PS to Johnston v Florida (2010) denied appeal re: new WAIS-IV scores</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3443848&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fpsychometric-ps-to-johnston-v-florida.html</link>
            <description>This is a follow-up to my brief comments yesterday regarding the Johstone v Fl (2010) denied MR/ID appeal of two days ago.As mentioned in the decision and my blog comment, the WAIS-III/WAIS-IV tests correlated .94 in a study reported in the WAIS-IV technical manual.  This is a very high correlation...but does NOT mean that the two tests should be expected to provide identical IQ scores.  I discuss these issues in a prior IAP AP101 report.The tests have different norm dates and thus, the later version (WAIS-IV) would be expected to provide a lower score based on the Flynn effect.  More importantly, as reported in the IAP AP101 report, when one calculates the standard deviation of the difference score (see page 6 of that report) for a correlation of .94, the resulting value is 5.2 (round ...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3443848</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3443848</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AAIDD Manual on intellectual disability:  Interviews related to legal, education and background of 11th edtion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3420621&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F03%2Faaidd-manual-on-intellectual-disability.html</link>
            <description>The AAIDD web site now has three video interviews available for viewing that deal with three broad topics related to the new green manual.&amp;nbsp; The titles, presenters, and links are provided below.&amp;nbsp; Click here for prior blomgaster (Dr. Kevin McGrew) critiques of the manual's chapter on intellectual functioning.On Legal Aspects of the New Intellectual Disability Definition Manual.&amp;nbsp; Co-author Ruth Luckasson, JD Distinguished Professor, University of New MexicoOn the New Intellectual Disability Definition Manual.&amp;nbsp; Co-author Bob Shalock, PhD Professor Emeritus and Former Psychology Chair, Hastings CollegeOn Education Aspects of the New Intellectual Disability Definition Manual.&amp;nbsp; Co-author Martha E. Snell, PhD Professor of Special Education, University of Virginia (Source: ...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3420621</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:02:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3420621</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AAIDD position paper on DSM-V proposed definition of intellectual disability (ID)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3302451&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F02%2Faaidd-position-paper-on-dsm-v-proposed.html</link>
            <description>Yesterday AAIDD presented its formal reaction to the DSM-V ASD and Developmental Disorders Subgroup, ID Subcommittee regarding the proposed DSM-V definition for intellectual disability (ID). The AAIDD 11th Edition Implementation Committee position paper (and recommendations) can be found by clicking here.Technorati Tags: psychology, forensic psychology, forensic psychiatry, neuropsychology, intelligence, IQ, IQ tests, IQ scores, adaptive behavior, intellectual disability, mental retardation, MR, ID, criminal psychology, criminal defense, ABA, American Bar Association, Atkins cases, death penalty, capital punishment, AAIDD, DSM-IV (Source: Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner))</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3302451</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:05:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3302451</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Critque of proposed DSM5 intellectual disability criteria:  Guest post by Dr. Dale Watson</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3267054&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fcritque-of-proposed-dsm5-intellectual.html</link>
            <description>Without question, the DSM-5 Proposed Draft Revision document has been generating considerable chatter among psychologists.&amp;nbsp; With regard to Atkins cases, the proposed definition of intellectual disability (ID) is no exception....emails and listservs have been busy debating and critiquing the ID proposed criteria.&amp;nbsp; Dr. Dale Watson has set out a well-written set of concerns and issues in the guest blog post below---which is reproduced &quot;as is&quot; from Dr. Watson.&amp;nbsp; Kudos to Dale for providing ICDP with his perspective.Dr. Dale Watson's critique of the proposed DSM-V ID criteria follows:The DSM-5 Proposed Draft Revisions to the Criterion sets for Mental Disorders have recently become available.&amp;nbsp; The proposed criteria for the diagnosis of Intellectual Disability retain the three-...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3267054</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:24:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3267054</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DSM-5:  Proposed draft revisions:  Intellectual Disability</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3259112&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fdsm-5-proposed-draft-revisions.html</link>
            <description>The Proposed Draft Revisions to DSM-5 are now available on line.  MR/ID is described as the following:Intellectual DisabilityA. Current intellectual deficits of two or more standard deviations below the population mean, which generally translates into performance in the lowest 3% of a person's age and cultural group, or an IQ of 70 or below. This should be measured with an individualized, standardized, culturally appropriate, psychometrically sound measure.B. And concurrent deficits in at least two domains of adaptive functioning of at least two or more standard deviations, which generally translates into performance in the lowest 3 % of a person's age and cultural group, or standard scores of 70 or below. This should be measured with individualized, standardized, culturally appropriate, ...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3259112</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:42:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3259112</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stephen Greenspan on &quot;60 Minutes&quot; to discuss gullibility</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3254577&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fstephen-greenspan-on-minutes-to-discuss.html</link>
            <description>Stephen Greenspan (ANNALS OF GULLIBILITY, Praeger, 2009) is scheduled to appear on a&amp;nbsp; 60 Minute segment scheduled to air on Sun, 2/14 @ 7 pm ET/PT; 6PM Central/ Mtn.&amp;nbsp; Greenspan has written extensively re: the critical importance of the concept of gullibility as it relates to the definition and identification of individuals with intellectual disabilities/mental retardation (ID/MR).According to Greenspan, the segment will focus mainly on Ponzi scheme implications, and will not get much or all into other implications, such as criminal justice, cognitive disabilities, Atkins MR death penalty cases, etc.Technorati Tags: Psychology, forensic psychology, forensic psychiatry, intellectual disabilities, mental retardation, social skills, social intelligence, social cognition, 60 minutes, ...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3254577</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:16:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3254577</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Intellectual heterogeneity of MR/ID as evidence against AAIDD &quot;stuck on g&quot; green manual:  Even in cleary genetic-based syndromes (Williams Syndrome)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3227900&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fintellectual-heterogeneity-of-mrid-as.html</link>
            <description>This study clearly suggests that even a population of individuals with a shared genetic causal mechanism display significant individual differences in patterns of cognitive abilities.&amp;nbsp; If this is found in ID/MR populations with a strong shared genetic causal mechanism, one would be hard-pressed to argue that such variability does not exist for more milder forms of ID/MR and the general population.My point (again)---I'm very concerned that the AAIDD 11th Edition ID manual's &quot;stuck on g&quot; position is out of synch with contemporary intelligence theory and measurement and has the potential to cause serious harm when potentially life-altering decisions are made on the basis of a single g-based composite IQ scores that ignores the heterogeneity of human cognitive abilities across the ability...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3227900</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3227900</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Wechsler-like IQ subtest scaled score metric:  The potential for misuse, misinterpretation and impact on critical life decisions---draft report in search of feedback</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3146092&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fwechsler-like-iq-subtest-scaled-score.html</link>
            <description>The following are the first three paragraphs (and a critical figure) of a draft of an IAP Applied Psychometrics 101 Brief Report (#5).&amp;nbsp; The complete report can be download in PDF format by clicking here.&amp;nbsp; A web-page version of the complete report can be found by clicking here (note - the web page verision may NOT display two embedded figures....viewing the PDF copy may be necessary)I'm providing this initial draft report with the expressed intent of soliciting feedback and comments regarding the accuracy and soundness of my analyses and logic.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking for critical feedback to improve the report.&amp;nbsp; This is a draft report that will be revised if comments suggest important changes.&amp;nbsp; Please read it in the spirit of &quot;tossing out some critical ideas&quot; for reflective a...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3146092</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:44:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3146092</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>State special education definitions of MR/ID</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3115198&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fstate-special-education-definitions-of.html</link>
            <description>This study examined the terms used to describe MR, the use of classification levels, the cutoff scores, and the adaptive behavior considerations for each state. In addition, this study examined guidelines for consideration of intelligence test part scores and consideration of the unreliability of IQs through consideration of the standard error of measurement (SEM) or an IQ range. As found in previous studies, results revealed great variation in the specific eligibility guidelines for MR from state to state. The greatest variation appeared to be across the adaptive behavior considerations. Approximately 20% of states (10) recommend consideration of intelligence test part scores, and approximately 39% of states (20) recommend attention to unreliability of IQs through consideration of the SEM...</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3115198</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3115198</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>AP101 Brief #1:  g or not to g:  IQ part vs full scale IQ scores in determining general intelligence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2899078&amp;cid=t_182161_122_f&amp;fid=37835&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iqscorner.com%2F2009%2F10%2Fap101-brief-1a-g-or-not-to-g-iq-part-vs.html</link>
            <description>IQs Corner readers may find the Applied Psychometrics 101 Brief #1:&amp;nbsp; g or not to g in Atkins MR death penalty cases (post at sister blog) of interest.&amp;nbsp; Briefly, the two-post AP101 Brief presents and disucsses the relative g-loadings (g-ness) of composite scores from the WAIS-III, WJ III, and KAIT in a university adult sample. Questions are raised, based on analysis of data from a sample of 200 young adults, regarding the use of different composite scores from intelligence batteries in place of the total (full scale) IQ score when considerable variability exists in an IQ batteries composite scores. (Source: Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner))</description>
            <author>Intelligent Insights on Intelligence Theories and Tests (aka IQ's Corner)</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2899078</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:06:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2899078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mutated Gene Linked to Epilepsy and Intellectual Disabilities in Women</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1436943&amp;cid=t_182161_133_f&amp;fid=35096&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAutismVox%2F%7E3%2F288949362%2F</link>
            <description>Researchers at Adelaide&amp;#8217;s Women&amp;#8217;s &amp; Children&amp;#8217;s Hospital and the University of Adelaide, Australia, have found that a mutant gene causes epilepsy and intellectual disabilities specific to women. As noted in Science Daily, the study links a &amp;#8220;large family of genes known as protocadherins with a condition known as &amp;#8216;epilepsy and mental retardation limited to females&amp;#8217; (EFMR).&amp;#8221; EFMR is described as &amp;#8220;relatively uncommon&amp;#8221; and also hereditary,
&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;.with successive generations of women affected. In just one of seven families studied across the world, 23 women were affected by the disorder across five generations. This discovery will now enable such families to benefit from genetic counselling, including screening for the genetic muta...</description>
            <author>Autism Vox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1436943</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:02:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1436943</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meds Proven Ineffective for Aggression in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1130977&amp;cid=t_182161_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F01%2F04%2Fmeds-proven-ineffective-for-aggression-in-intellectual-and-developmental-disabilities%2F</link>
            <description>Despite their widespread use amongst doctors who treat adults with developmental disabilities and mental retardation, a new study has found that a specific type of psychiatric medication &amp;#8212; antipsychotics &amp;#8212; to be ineffective in helping reduce these individuals&amp;#8217; aggressive behavior. Antipsychotics are generally not FDA-approved for the treatment of aggressive behavior, this has simply been an off-label and common practice by many physicians for years.
	The researchers followed 86 non-psychotic people with an intellectual disability (what we in the U.S. would term either a developmental disability or mental retardation) and aggressive or challenging behaviors. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups &amp;#8212; an older antipsychotic (Haldol), a newer at...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1130977</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:43:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1130977</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

