<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: interstate</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'interstate'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22interstate%22&t=%22interstate%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:59:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>California Wants Amazon to Tax Californians</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4984421&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F2xbpOrm84Pw%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperThe Los Angeles Times has a good article on California&amp;#8217;s move to require Amazon and other out-of-state retailers to collect taxes for it. Good because it accurately portrays what&amp;#8217;s happening. Many such stories will say that California is seeking to tax Amazon. In fact, says the headline, &amp;#8220;California Tells Online Retailers to Start Collecting Sales Taxes From Customers.&amp;#8221;
You see, Californians generally don&amp;#8217;t pay their &amp;#8220;use taxes&amp;#8220;&amp;#8212;the alternative to sales taxes, for things brought into the state from outside. If the tax authorities tried to collect use taxes, going door to door to tally up the goods that haven&amp;#8217;t yet been taxed, there would be bedlam.
So they want out-of-state companies that sell into California to collect the...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4984421</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:42:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4984421</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Federalism and Med-Mal Reform</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4862513&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FmGTytT7-JcU%2F</link>
            <description>By Walter OlsonThanks to star libertarian lawprof and Cato senior fellow Randy Barnett for pointing out something that has needed saying for a while: most proposals in the U.S. Congress to address medical malpractice law run into serious federalism problems.
Most medical malpractice suits go forward in state courts under state law. If the U.S. Congress wishes to impose a nationwide rule on these suits, such as by limiting damages for pain and suffering, it first needs to answer the question: under which of the federal government&amp;#8217;s constitutionally prescribed powers is it acting? Even if it can identify such authority, it should also ask: is it a wise idea—consistent with what one might call a prudential federalism—to gather yet more power in Washington at the expense of the state...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4862513</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 19:43:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4862513</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Life of One’s Own</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4820815&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fy8gddXuGRv8%2F</link>
            <description>By Trevor BurrusSince Tuesday’s oral arguments in Virginia v. Sebelius—the first Obamacare challenge to reach the circuit court level, and one in which Cato also filed an amicus brief—the legal blogosphere has been discussing the Fourth Circuit panel’s incredulity concerning the activity/inactivity distinction at the heart of our arguments against Obamacare. As Ilya Shapiro explains, we contend that if Congress’s power to regulate “interstate commerce” reaches the inactivity of not buying health insurance, then there is nothing it does not reach. The Supreme Court will eventually have to grapple with this question and decide whether the distinction is constitutionally meaningful.
As Volokh conspirator Jonathan Adler points out, the activity/inactivity distinction is long-stan...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4820815</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:25:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4820815</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Yes, Says Virginia, There Are Limits on Federal Power</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4813260&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FTRqxGl4BsSo%2F</link>
            <description>By Ilya ShapiroToday, the Fourth Circuit became the first appellate court in the nation to enter the Obamacare fray.  It heard two very similar cases back-to-back, Liberty University’s, in which the government won in the district court, and the Commonwealth of Virginia’s, in which Judge Henry Hudson struck down the individual mandate back in December.  Going into the hearing, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s legal team had done a wonderful job setting out the reasons why Hudson was correct and why Congress went too far in asserting the unprecedented power to compel people to enter into contracts with private insurance companies.  I was proud to sign Cato’s brief supporting that position and continue to maintain that the federal government cannot require people to buy g...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4813260</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:57:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4813260</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cite the Constitutional Authority or the Lack Thereof!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4377554&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FTJzTFPdiFrM%2F</link>
            <description>By William A. NiskanenA new House rule requires that every new bill or joint resolution introduced in the House include a statement citing the specific powers in the Constitution granted to Congress to enact the proposed law.  In the absence of such a statement, the clerk of the House will not accept the bill and it will be returned to the sponsor.
This new rule may have two potentially valuable effects:

For some time, this rule may have a valuable educational effect, reminding new House members, returning members, and the public that Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution authorizes only 18 federal powers – far fewer than the powers that the federal government has assumed, especially during the past 75 years.
The constitutional citations for House bills that are approved would be pa...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4377554</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:12:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4377554</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HIEs in the Public Interest</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3823005&amp;cid=t_138853_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fhies-public-interest</link>
            <description>The Health Information Exchange (HIE) market is the Wild West right now.&amp;nbsp; Vendors are telling us that they are seeing an unprecedented level of activity both for private and public HIEs.&amp;nbsp; Private HIEs are being set-up by large and small healthcare organizations to more tightly align affiliated physicians to a hospital or IDN to drive referrals and longer term, better manage transitions in care in anticipation of payment reform.&amp;nbsp; Public HIEs are those state driven initiatives that have blossomed with the $560M+ of federal funding via the HITECH Act. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3823005</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:44:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3823005</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Kagan May Well Become “The Liberal Scalia”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3714166&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FOh1t0eckg08%2F</link>
            <description>By Ilya ShapiroMore highlights from Day 2 of the Kagan confirmation hearings:
•  In addition to backing away from President Obama’s empathy standard, Elena Kagan, under questioning by Senator Grassley, backs away from her “judicial hero” Aharon Barak, saying that she does not share his judicial philosophy, which involves judges making policy decisions and affirmatively shaping society.  This is an important concession.  Grassley also elicits the statement that only the president and Congress should worry about American influence in the world.
•  The wily Arlen Specter, in his last Supreme Court hearing (unless Justice Ginsburg retires over the summer), treats his questioning as a prosecutor would.  Technical questions and cutting off responses when Kagan begins to expound on...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3714166</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:32:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3714166</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ask Kagan about ObamaCare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3563950&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F1sodhiyl8es%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonSenate Judiciary Committee members should be sure to ask Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, during her upcoming confirmation hearings, whether she or her office played any part in crafting ObamaCare or the administration&amp;#8217;s defense to the lawsuits challenging that law.  If Kagan helped to craft either, that would present a conflict of interest: when those lawsuits reach the Supreme Court, she would be sitting in judgment over a case in which she had already taken sides.
Though the Solicitor General deals with appellate matters, it is certainly possible that Kagan was consulted during the drafting of the law or the administration&amp;#8217;s legal strategy for defending it.
The Senate Democrats who drafted ObamaCare took pains to protect it from...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3563950</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:57:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3563950</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama: CEO of America, Inc.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3298304&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FQtoZq-2OhrU%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday Politico Arena asks:
Will President Obama&amp;#8217;s proposal to block excessive rate increases by insurers help get a health care package through Congress?
My response:
Just where does President Obama think Congress finds the power to authorize the HHS secretary &amp;#8220;to review, and to block, premium increases by private insurers, potentially superseding state insurance regulators&amp;#8221;?  My colleague David Boaz addresses the politics of this unseemly proposal just below.  And elsewhere our colleague Michael Cannon offers a devastating economic critique of the proposal, citing White House economic advisor Larry Summers, no less, on the folly of it all.  But the constitutional question is what concerns me.
No doubt Obama, a former lecturer in constitutional law, beli...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3298304</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:28:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3298304</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama’s Recycled Moderate-Speed Rail Plan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2347783&amp;cid=t_138853_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FXoayINLz6MA%2F</link>
            <description>The Obama administration believes in recycling, as shown by the so-called high-speed rail plan it announced last week. Below is a map of the plan, and below that is a map of the Federal Railroad Administration&amp;#8217;s 2005 high-speed rail plan. As you can see, the proposed routes are identical. (The grey lines on the first map represent conventional Amtrak routes.)



Of course, this is a time-honored practice. Eisenhower&amp;#8217;s Interstate Highway System was really the Bureau of Public Roads&amp;#8217; Interregional Highway System. There is no doubt that the Federal Railroad Administration is thrilled that Obama has adopted its plan.
Yet there are several problems with Obama&amp;#8217;s plan. First, it is important to understand that most of Obama&amp;#8217;s plan is not bullet trains or TGVs. Instea...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2347783</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:27:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2347783</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Autistic Boy Goes For a Drive, With Police in Pursuit</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=793485&amp;cid=t_138853_133_f&amp;fid=35096&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAutismVox%2F%7E3%2F142968136%2F</link>
            <description>Drivers in the Autism Speaks 400, a 2007 NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Series race held back in June, were racing to raise funds for Autism Speaks&amp;#8212;&amp;#8211;on Friday morning, a 12-year-old autistic boy took his parents&amp;#8217; car for a drive on three highways around St. Louis. As Fox News reports, the boy stole the keys to his parents&amp;#8217; car about two days ago; while they were at work, he took their car to the McDonalds in Chesterfield, a suburb west of St. Louis. At Interstate 40 and Mason the boy was seen driving 45-50 miles per hour; he then got onto Interstate 270 and the Interstate 44, where police from Town and Country boxed the car in and forced it to stop around 9.30am, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch (which refers to the boy as having &amp;#8220;special needs&amp;#8221;). The boy was...</description>
            <author>Autism Vox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=793485</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:28:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">793485</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

